Rand Paul

Ron Paul talks ending the Fed with help from Senator Rand Paul on Fox Business

November 3rd, 2010 9:08 pm  |  by  |  Published in Andrew Napolitano, Banking, Big Government, Commentary, Constitution, Economics, Federal Reserve, FOX news, government spending, inflation, Liberty, Money, Rand Paul, Ron Paul  |  7 Responses

Well, to be quite fair Ron Paul said they talked about introducing a bill to end or audit the Fed on their first day in office together. Here is the entire long and excellent interview with David Asman on Fox Business channel.

Ron Paul also talks about becoming the new Chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy with the GOP taking control of the House.

The subcommittee’s jurisdiction includes domestic monetary policy, and agencies which directly or indirectly affect domestic monetary policy, multilateral development lending institutions such as the World Bank, coins and currency including operations of the Bureau of the Mint and the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, and international trade and finance including all matters pertaining to the International Monetary Fund and the Export-Import Bank.

I don’t think there could be a more perfect subcommittee for Ron Paul.

Later in the interview Judge Napolitano joins the discussion. Check it out below.

Rand Paul on CNN with Wolf Blitzer after Victory

November 3rd, 2010 12:06 am  |  by  |  Published in Big Government, Debt, Election, government spending, Politics, Rand Paul, Ron Paul  |  0

Here’s Rand Paul being interviewed by Wolf Blitzer following his victory over Jack Conway.

Rand Paul wins, Dems bow down before Aqua Buddha, Boehner cries, and other election thoughts

November 2nd, 2010 11:55 pm  |  by  |  Published in Activism, Big Government, Commentary, congress, Election, Free Market, Fund Raising, Individual Responsibility, Liberty, Maven Commentary, Politics, Rand Paul, Ron Paul  |  0

In one of the several interviews Liberty Maven did with Rand Paul I asked a question about strategy that I believe is the main reason Rand Paul won and is now Senator-elect Rand Paul. Here is that question and Rand’s excellent response again:

LM: Your recent op-ed in USA Today discussing libertarianism and conservatism where you deemed yourself “not quite” a libertarian seemed to be another (rather successful in my view) effort to unite conservatives and libertarians by focusing on where there are agreements. Is one of your fundamental campaign strategies to foster agreement between these groups?

Rand Paul: Yes, it is. The views that unite many conservatives and libertarians are grounded in deference to the Constitution and its principles, and a belief in limited government. These ideals have not been acted upon by many in Washington recently, and that’s why I’m running. It’s also why the Tea Parties exist – frustration with a lack of accountability on spending and the size of government.

These ideals – and the joining of all limited government advocates — form the basis for my campaign this year, one that has struck a chord with Republicans, independents, libertarians, and Tea Party activists. For the country’s sake I hope we can keep these groups in agreement and united against those who do not hold the same respect for those Constitutional principles.

Yes. I believe that about sums up why Rand Paul was successful. He united all flavors of voters. The Republicans, libertarians, independents, conservatives, and tea partiers joined together to support him. He also united progressives pretty well too. They were downright venomous for some reason. I guess that’s the way they roll when they disagree with someone.

A little less than a year ago I posted an article entitled, “Why Rand Paul Will Win“. I listed three reasons: public sentiment, fund raising, and the “it” factor. In retrospect it was mostly public sentiment that turned the tide in his favor in both the primary and general.

Also of note, Rand Paul’s father Ron, won his race. There’s a slight chance Ron Paul could be in line for a committee or sub-committee chairmanship now that the House is changing control to the GOP. It’s likely we’ll all be seeing more of the always-entertaining hearing sessions with Ben Bernanke tap dancing around Ron Paul’s questions. I also believe it to be quite likely we’ll see Ron Paul running for president in 2012 given the results and public opinion. Fox News even threw some love Ron’s way by mentioning him as the catalyst for his son’s and the tea party’s victories. Prepare your bank account for an onslaught of money bombs next year and in 2012.

As for the meaning of this election…

Read More »

10 Questions on Election Eve: Rand Paul, Ron Paul, and the Tea Party

November 1st, 2010 9:18 pm  |  by  |  Published in Big Government, Commentary, congress, Constitution, Election, Frank Wolf, Liberty, Maven Commentary, Politics, Rand Paul, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin  |  9 Responses

Admittedly, I’m conflicted on this particular election eve. I’m excited at the potential for actual change if many of these so-called “tea party” candidates get elected. That potential is based upon hope more than expectation. If I decide to vote, I’ll vote for the Libertarian candidate in my district. I’m glad I have that choice since I can’t stand the GOP candidate (30 year incumbent Frank Wolf) nor can I stand the Democrat (Obamacare supporter).

That being said I have some questions. Most won’t be answered in the near term, but will be answered within the next 2 years.

  1. Will Rand Paul win in another “Randslide”?
  2. If Sharon Angle defeats Harry Reid will Chuck Schumer become the leader of the Senate?
  3. Should Rand Paul win, will he lose the support of the Tea Party during his term as Senator?
  4. Will Ron Paul’s supporters be happy with the way Rand Paul votes on foreign policy?
  5. If the GOP takes control of the House will Ron Paul become the Chairman of the Financial Services Committee?
  6. Will the Republicans be able to repeal Obamacare?
  7. Are the Republicans going to to water down the Tea Party message by playing the same old political game?
  8. Will Sarah Palin become the GOP nominee in 2012 due to her perceived influence on the Tea Party candidates winning in 2010?
  9. When will Ron Paul announce he is running for President in 2012 (My guess is sometime in January of 2011)?
  10. When Republicans gain control of the House and nothing changes will a Third Party option become truly viable in 2012?

Those are the main questions I have. Do you have any to add?

Ron Paul and Jim DeMint unite for Rand Paul

October 3rd, 2010 8:30 am  |  by  |  Published in Big Government, Commentary, congress, Debate, Election, FOX news, Liberty, Politics, Rand Paul, Ron Paul  |  1

Once again Jim DeMint and Ron Paul have formed a coalition. They have worked hard on getting a full Federal Reserve audit and share many commonalities on economic issues. Now they come together for a campaign fund raiser for Ron Paul’s son, Rand Paul in Kentucky. Hmmm I wonder if DeMint and Ron Paul discussed any plans of forming another coalition for 2012 as suggested in our recent poll.

The local media focused on the small number of protesters at the event rather than the event itself.

In less than one hour from the time of this writing, Rand Paul and Jack Conway will appear together with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday for a nationally televised debate. The debate has no rules and will comprise the first half-hour of the show. It airs at 9am Eastern on most local Fox affiliates. The latest polls still show Rand Paul with a lead in the race.

How To Tell If You’ve Had Too Much Politics

October 3rd, 2010 8:07 am  |  by  |  Published in Debate, Election, Fund Raising, Humor, Philosophy, Politics, Polling, Radio, Rand Paul, Sarah Palin, Television  |  0

Just about now you, as an American voter, are reaching critical political mass. Pummeled by incessant TV, radio, and newspaper ads, and deluged by dinnertime taped phone calls you want to kill the next person who brings up the election.

Then, again, you may have crossed over into that Zombieland of voting in which you can’t seem to get enough of the heady stuff. While the former state is normal, here’s how to tell if you’ve really had too much politics for the season and are badly in need of a vacation or at least electroshock therapy:

1) You know Sarah Palin’s dog’s favorite color.
2) You can recite the Hatch Act from memory.
3) You call polling companies and beg to be polled.
4) You can’t wait for TV shows to end so you can start enjoying the campaign commercials.
5) You’ve come to believe that Rand Paul is a type of gold coin.
6) You can spell Ben Bernanke’s name forward AND backwards.
7) Your shirt has color-coded campaign buttons with Republicans on the right side, Democrats on the left, and Libertarians down the middle.
8) You agree with every political view no matter who holds it yet become irritated when someone refuses to have an opinion.
9) Your Favorites menu on your computer browser is full of campaign websites.
10) You can’t be reached on the Internet because your e-mail account is glutted with campaign spam.
11) You’ve got a space reserved in front of the early voting place so that you can get there before midnight.
12) You’ve got a tattoo of your favorite candidate on your shoulder and you were the tattoo artist.
13) You’ve painted half your car red and the other half blue.
14) You invite campaign flyer distributors into your house for coffee and cookies and to have a heart-to-heart.
15) You’ve removed the heads from your bobblehead collection and replaced them with leading candidates.
16) You straighten up campaign signs at intersections.
17) Your alarm clock has campaign ads to awaken you.
18) You call radio talk shows just to hear them breathe.
19) Instead of Fantasy Football, you play Fantasy Politics.
20) Your friends avoid you because all you want to talk about is the latest polling numbers.
21) When you dream, it’s of filling out your ballot.
22) Your iPod is full of recorded campaign speeches.
23) You’re disappointed when, after the phone rings, it’s only your mother calling and not a pre-recorded message from a local candidate.
24) You burned out your TIVO recording late-night political shows.
25) Your car has so many campaign stickers on it, it makes two miles less per gallon.

One in the Senate for Rand Paul w/ Jim DeMint, Peter Schiff, more

September 28th, 2010 7:41 pm  |  by  |  Published in Big Government, Fund Raising, Liberty, Politics, Polling, Rand Paul  |  1

Tonight begins the Rand Paul “One in the Senate” money bomb telethon. You can get all the details here:

Earlier this month, Jack Tough raised over $300,000 in a money bomb of his own, and is looking to raise another $100K in the closing days of this quarter. Now more than ever, Rand Paul needs your help. This is our last, best chance to put one defender of Liberty into the US Senate. The last week of this quarter is crucial to the campaign in terms of fundraising.

Rand’s final money bomb of the quarter starts tonight, when the ticker goes live on the RandPaul2010.com site

Tomorrow there will be a Moneybomb Telethon with special guests Senator Jim DeMint, John Dennis, Clint Didier, Jake Towne, Wayne Allen Root, Peter Schiff, Joe the Plumber, Steve Dore and more.

Yes, it is certainly time to put your money where your liberty is. This is the home stretch.

You can watch the Telethon right here beginning at 9am Eastern:

Obama Supporters Knock On Doors For Jack Conway In Kentucky

August 30th, 2010 3:42 pm  |  by  |  Published in Election, Health Care, Politics, Rand Paul  |  2 Responses

President Obama’s hardcore supporters aren’t wasting any time trying to get the Obama administration another vote for their radical left-wing agenda. In Kentucky, they have started an intense door-to-door campaign urging voters to support “Obama-friendly” candidates like Jack Conway.

Louisville WHAS 11′s political reporter Joe Arnold has the scoop:

Supporters of the policies of President Barack Obama knocked on doors in Louisville and Lexington over the weekend, as part of the “Moving America Forward” canvass to “support Democratic allies for President Obama.”

Presumably, that includes candidates for federal office, Jack Conway and John Yarmuth.

According to a release from Organizing for America-Kentucky (OFA-KY), volunteers are reaching out “to 2008 first time voters, sporadic voters, and newly registered voters to talk to them about the importance of electing Democratic allies for President Obama who will keep the country moving in the right direction.”

As President Obama has made clear in recent weeks, this election represents a choice between Democrats who have worked tirelessly to move the country forward or a return to the failed Republican policies that set the country in the wrong direction. Since taking office, President Obama and Congressional Democrats have passed historic reforms to the health insurance industry and Wall Street, and pulled the American economy back from the brink of depression.

Jack Conway was named by Senator Robert Menendez, leader of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, as “the next Obama.”

Voters should question why Jack Conway used his support for ObamaCare in the primary to defeat the conservative Democratic candidate Daniel Mongiardo – Jack also pandered to the left on the Bush tax cuts against Mongiardo, only to pander back after the primary (the media did not report it) – but, now, Conway does not campaign on his support for the extreme Obama lead takeover of the health care industry.

Last week, the National Republican Senatorial Committee launched this ad in Kentucky pointing out Jack Conway’s support for the Obama lead legislation.

But the similarities don’t stop with ObamaCare, several of Jack Conway’s limited issues listed on his campaign website resemble Barack Obama campaign pledges; especially, Jack Conway’s “jobs plan.”

Is Jack Conway the next Obama? Or was Barack Obama’s platform a one-hit wonder?

Jack Conway faces Dr. Rand Paul in Kentucky for the senate seat being vacated by retiring United States Senator Jim Bunning.

Ron Paul talks Ground Zero Mosque “side show” on Anderson Cooper 360 on CNN

August 24th, 2010 12:58 am  |  by  |  Published in Big Government, Civil Liberties, Commentary, Free Market, Liberty, Rand Paul, Ron Paul  |  17 Responses

Ron Paul appeared on Anderson Cooper 360 last night to discuss his own position on the building of a mosque near ground zero. The interview gets interesting when the host delves into the differences between Ron Paul’s views and his son Rand’s views on the building of the mosque.

Ron Paul’s views could not be more in line with my own and represent the most purely consistent view on the matter.

“…the side show, which is what I call this..”  – Ron Paul on the ground zero mosque

(Thanks to Minnesota Chris for the video)

Pornography, Media, and Politics: Rand Paul vs. Jack Conway

August 21st, 2010 2:23 am  |  by  |  Published in Civil Liberties, Commentary, congress, Election, Fund Raising, Liberty, Maven Commentary, Media, Politics, Rand Paul  |  2 Responses

And so it continues. The Associated Press released an article attacking Rand Paul for receiving donations from “pornographers”. This latest attack just happens to coincide with the second day of his 2 day money bomb commemorating his father Ron Paul’s birthday. Over $250,000 was raised, but instead, let’s talk a bit about what is pornography and what isn’t.

First, the contributors run a web site called Zivity.com. It’s an adult social media site where models, photographers, and users unite to create and appreciate artsy photography of the mostly non-nude female form. In the minds of some this may pass for “pornography”, but I’d say most people would agree this is more art than porn. Have a look yourself.

Michael Arrington at TechCrunch gets it right.

Despite the fact that the donations weren’t from Zivity, and that Zivity would barely fall under the definition of pornography, people are calling for Rand to return the money. Says someone who has no idea what he’s talking about:

“A lot of Kentuckians would have a problem with a candidate accepting money from organizations that are tearing down the culture,” said Martin Cothran, a policy analyst for The Family Foundation of Kentucky. “And we assume that the Paul campaign understands that.”

Schreiner himself seems to have little knowledge of Zivity either. By phone yesterday he asked me if I could tell him more about the site. He had not, apparently, ventured farther than the home page.

The fact is Zivity is nowhere near as graphic as mainstream television. Sexual acts are never shown, and often the models aren’t even undressed. A typical Saturday evening on Showtime or HBO would be far more likely to “tear down our culture,” in the words of whoever that guy is. And I doubt the AP would be trying to make a big deal out of a HBO employee making a donation to a campaign.

It’s pretty safe to chalk this one up to the recent trend of the left media’s attempts to spread dirt on Rand Paul every chance they get. Oh and by the way, Martin Cothran quoted above, still plans on voting for Rand Paul as he makes clear in an article of his own.

Now what follows is what the media should be talking about. To me this passes as far more pornographic than what the folks of Zivity are doing…

Read More »