<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberty Maven &#187; Liberty Maven: For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertymaven.com/category/debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertymaven.com</link>
	<description>For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:58:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul&#8217;s debate moments and Bachmann lies</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2011/12/16/ron-pauls-debate-moments-and-bachmann-lies/11992/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2011/12/16/ron-pauls-debate-moments-and-bachmann-lies/11992/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blowback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic energy agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building a bomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development of nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international atomic energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international atomic energy agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michele bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michelle bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear bomb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear weapon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sole purpose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tehran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time frame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=11992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of the more interesting exchanges in last night&#8217;s GOP Debate on FOX News, Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann found some time to disagree with each other. Without checking on the facts of what each said, one could walk away believing something that was just not true. Which candidate lied? Here is your answer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of the more interesting exchanges in last night&#8217;s GOP Debate on FOX News, Ron Paul and Michelle Bachmann found some time to disagree with each other. Without checking on the facts of what each said, one could walk away believing something that was just not true. Which candidate lied? Here is your answer from <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-gingrich-off-budget-history-024958105.html">&#8220;FACT CHECK&#8221; via the AP</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">MICHELE BACHMANN: &#8220;We have an IAEA report that just recently came out that said literally Iran is within just months of being able to obtain that (a nuclear) weapon.&#8221;<br />
RON PAUL: &#8220;There is no U.N. report that said that. It&#8217;s totally wrong, what you just said.&#8221;<br />
Bachmann: &#8220;It&#8217;s the IAEA report.&#8221;<br />
THE FACTS: As Paul said, the report of the International Atomic Energy Agency does not state that Iran is within months of having nuclear arms. The U.N. agency report does suggest that Iran conducted secret experiments whose sole purpose is the development of nuclear weapons but did not put a time frame on when Iran might succeed in building a bomb, and it made no final conclusion on Tehran&#8217;s intent.<br />
Bachmann also erred by arguing that Iran has &#8220;stated they will use it (a nuclear weapon) against the United States.&#8221;<br />
Iran vehemently rejects that it is developing a nuclear bomb, let alone that it plans to drop one on the U.S.</p>
<p>Yes, unsurprisingly it was Michelle Bachmann who lied or I guess if you are a supporter of hers, &#8220;stretched the truth&#8221;. Bachmann also appears to have lied about what is in the Iranian Constitution, claiming it &#8220;states unequivocally&#8221; to stretch &#8220;jihad across the world&#8221;. Well, unless the Wikipedia interpretation of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_the_Islamic_Republic_of_Iran">Iranian Constitution</a> is wrong I see no mention of &#8220;jihad&#8221; or &#8220;caliphate&#8221;. In fact, it directly mentions foreign policy in section X, saying in part:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Article 152 The foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is based upon the rejection of all forms of domination, both the exertion of it and submission to it, the preservation of the independence of the country in all respects and its territorial integrity, the defence of the rights of all Muslims, non-alignment with respect to the hegemonic superpowers, and the maintenance of mutually peaceful relations with all non-belligerent States.</p>
<p>There is certainly no &#8220;unequivocal&#8221; mention of jihad against the world. Hopefully voters will see through Bachmann&#8217;s and Santorum&#8217;s melodramatic horse-hockey.</p>
<p>Here are all of Ron Paul&#8217;s moments in the debate, totaling over 18 minutes:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhbGL3F8r4c">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhbGL3F8r4c</a></p>
<p><strong><a href="https://secure.ronpaul2012.com/">DONATE TODAY</a></strong>! It&#8217;s Tea Party &#8217;11 Money Bomb Time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2011/12/16/ron-pauls-debate-moments-and-bachmann-lies/11992/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>During ABC Debate, Ron Paul was at his best</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2011/12/11/during-abc-debate-ron-paul-was-at-his-best/11935/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2011/12/11/during-abc-debate-ron-paul-was-at-his-best/11935/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 07:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abc gop debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nbsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=11935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve watched Ron Paul over the course of several years, drinking in his comments and positions. At times I actually find myself bored with him because I already know what his answer will be. Of course this also demonstrates just how consistent Paul is. In the ABC GOP debate last night I&#8217;m not sure I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve watched Ron Paul over the course of several years, drinking in his comments and positions. At times I actually find myself bored with him because I already know what his answer will be. Of course this also demonstrates just how consistent Paul is. In the ABC GOP debate last night I&#8217;m not sure I saw him perform better. I don&#8217;t know if I would have said this a year ago, as I tend to be realistic about things, but he could win Iowa. He could win New Hampshire. Hell, he could even be the GOP nominee. I&#8217;ll discuss that more in a future article. For now, watch Ron Paul&#8217;s answer&#8217;s during the debate below and marvel at how he&#8217;s transformed himself into a more polished, calm, and charming candidate to go along with his life-long love of liberty.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3QJL6IiNYo">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3QJL6IiNYo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2011/12/11/during-abc-debate-ron-paul-was-at-his-best/11935/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why A Debt Ceiling Is Better Than A Balanced Budget Amendment</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2011/05/26/why-a-debt-ceiling-is-better-than-a-balanced-budget-amendment/11672/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2011/05/26/why-a-debt-ceiling-is-better-than-a-balanced-budget-amendment/11672/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 02:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DownsizeDC.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced budget amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distant future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[february 1994]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infinite capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[member of parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neil hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powerful system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vapor ware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=11672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quote of the Day: &#8220;I have always believed that government had a limited capacity to do good and a virtually infinite capacity to do harm&#8230;&#8221; &#8212; Neil Hamilton, Member of Parliament in the United Kingdom (Source: House of Commons debates, 8 February 1994) Earlier this year, we thought we&#8217;d be willing to trade an increase [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><strong>Quote of the Day</strong>: &#8220;I have always believed that government had a limited capacity to do good and a virtually infinite capacity to do harm&#8230;&#8221; &#8212; <a href="http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Neil.Hamilton.Quote.904A" target="_blank">Neil Hamilton, Member of Parliament in the United Kingdom (Source: House of Commons debates, 8 February 1994) </a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Earlier this year, we thought we&#8217;d be willing to  trade an increase in the debt ceiling for something of lasting value &#8212;  like a balanced budget amendment. We now think that&#8217;s a strategic  mistake.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">The real strategic opportunity lies in the debt  ceiling itself. As long as we maintain THAT, then nothing else needs to  be done to balance the budget. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;"><a href="https://secure.downsizedc.org/etp/campaigns/146" target="_blank">We&#8217;ve started a permanent new campaign to promote this idea called, &#8220;Cap the Debt.&#8221; </a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Here&#8217;s what I wrote in my first letter to Congress using this new campaign . . .<span id="more-11672"></span></span></p>
<blockquote dir="ltr"><p><span style="font-family: Arial;">I believe it&#8217;s better to retain the current debt  ceiling than to raise the ceiling in return for a balanced budget  amendment (BBA).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">A BBA is vapor-ware. It may not be ratified by the  States, and even if it is, Congress may not obey it. It&#8217;s not like you  guys obey the rest of the Constitution. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">A BBA might theoretically lead to a balanced  budget in the distant future, IF it gets ratified, and IF Congress obeys  it, but the debt ceiling is in place NOW, and can balance the budget  NOW, if only YOU will retain it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Do NOT raise the debt ceiling for ANY purpose as  part of ANY deal. Let the current ceiling be a true ceiling. Cap the  debt now, permanently. </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">END LETTER</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">If you agree with this idea, please send a letter  of your own to Congress. You can copy or borrow from my personal  comments above. <a href="https://secure.downsizedc.org/etp/campaigns/146" target="_blank">You can use DownsizeDC.org&#8217;s Educate the Powerful System to send your letter. </a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Please ask your friends to send letters too. We  need all hands on deck. House Republicans can do this by themselves if  they have the courage, so they need to hear that voters want this.  Democrats in conservative districts might be persuaded to go this way  too. And all those in Congress who think the ceiling shouldn&#8217;t really be  a ceiling need to get <span style="font-family: Arial;">a</span> letter too. Let&#8217;s make them nervous about their irresponsibility.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">And don&#8217;t stop there. We want the word<span style="font-family: Arial;">s</span> &#8220;Cap the Debt&#8221; to be on everyone&#8217;s lips. This is a social media  opportunity. We&#8217;ve created a Facebook page, just for this campaign. <a href="http://www.facebook.com/CapTheDebt" target="_blank">Please become a Facebook &#8220;Fan&#8221; of &#8220;Cap The Debt.&#8221; </a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Jim Babka<br />
President<br />
DownsizeDC.org, Inc. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: green;"><strong>D o w n s i z e r &#8211; D i s p a t c h</strong></span></p>
<p>Official email newsletter of <a href="http://www.downsizedc.org/" target="_blank">DownsizeDC.org, Inc.</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.downsizedcfoundation.org/" target="_blank">Downsize DC Foundation</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2011/05/26/why-a-debt-ceiling-is-better-than-a-balanced-budget-amendment/11672/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>05/05/2011 Ron Paul, Gary Johnson, others in GOP Debate &#8211; Full Video</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2011/05/06/05052011-ron-paul-gary-johnson-others-in-gop-debate-full-video/11595/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2011/05/06/05052011-ron-paul-gary-johnson-others-in-gop-debate-full-video/11595/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 04:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founding father]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http www youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judgement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legalizing drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michele bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playlist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stellar moments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=11595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Paul is on fire. That is my opinion of his performance in this first GOP debate. Of course, I&#8217;m biased. Feel free to make your own judgement after watching the entire debate below. There were a few stellar moments from Ron Paul, including his answer when asked about legalizing drugs, and his answer about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is on fire. That is my opinion of his performance in this first GOP debate. Of course, I&#8217;m biased. Feel free to make your own judgement after watching the entire debate below. There were a few stellar moments from Ron Paul, including his answer when asked about legalizing drugs, and his answer about being the &#8220;Founding Father&#8221; of the Tea Party movement regarding Michele Bachmann.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with a lot of what Herman Cain says, but I have to admit he has charisma that will give him a lot of support. Expect the other candidates to start attacking him if his poll numbers go up. I think they will. </p>
<p>Gary Johnson did very well with a few odd moments. If I&#8217;m looking at him through social-con or neo-con eyes voting for him would likely be impossible. He did come off as a very honest &#8220;make the hard choices&#8221; candidate. Sort of like Cain without the charisma.</p>
<p>Pawlenty seems to be channeling John McCain a bit too much and Santorum just comes off as angry. Both seem to be going after the George W. Bush voting block; however small that is these days.</p>
<p>Enjoy the entire debate below.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/p/AD6B075FD92B69BA?hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/p/AD6B075FD92B69BA?hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2011/05/06/05052011-ron-paul-gary-johnson-others-in-gop-debate-full-video/11595/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Statism and In Health: Should Government Define Marriage?</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2011/04/02/in-statism-and-in-health-should-government-define-marriage/11513/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2011/04/02/in-statism-and-in-health-should-government-define-marriage/11513/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Winberry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=11513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage is and has long been a cultural, social and wedge issue in American politics. One of the more dramatic turns of defining marriage came in the landmark 1967 Supreme Court decision Loving v. Virginia in which the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that bans on interracial marriage were unconstitutional. Some forty years later, interracial marriage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is and has long been a cultural, social and wedge issue in American politics. One of the more dramatic turns of defining marriage came in the landmark 1967 Supreme Court decision Loving v. Virginia in which the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that bans on interracial marriage were unconstitutional. Some forty years later, interracial marriage inspires little debate and has mostly been seen as an acceptable definition of marriage. However, as the twenty-first century dawned and developed, the issue of marriage definition has again come into American politics.</p>
<p>In 1996, President Clinton signed the federal Defense of Marriage Act or DOMA into law. DOMA, which President Obama has recently (and unconstitutionally) declared  unconstitutional, said that the United States federal Government recognized marriage as a relationship between one man and one woman. It also said that no state would have to recognize the gay marriage of another state. Thus, an Alabama gay couple could not be married in Massachusetts and return home as newlyweds.</p>
<p>In 2008, Californians passed Proposition Eight, a measure barring gays from marrying in the Golden State. The proposition had passed narrowly in the general election and was later struck down by federal judge Vaughn Walker. A similar measure had previously been declared unconstitutional by the California Supreme Court.</p>
<p>Still, all the talk about how government defines marriage begs another question: should the government define marriage?</p>
<p>In several interviews, former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura has expressed the idea that “love is bigger than government” and argues that government should recognize civil unions between any two consenting adults and that the term “marriage” should be saved for churches and the private sector.</p>
<p>This is an idea that Libertarians should embrace. Americans have become hung up on the term “marriage”. Still, public opinion poll has showed time and time again that the vast majority of Americans support basic rights for gay and lesbian individuals including legal and sometimes financial benefits. Granting every adult, consenting couple a civil union would allow all citizens the rights they deserve as far as their partners are concerned. Additionally, it would continue the support of separation between church and state.</p>
<p>For too long, the American People have allowed their government to define what is and what is not marriage. A couple who love each other shouldn’t need the State’s permission to bind themselves legally and equivalently together. Civil Unions would grant equality to law abiding citizens and would promote freedom for all individuals regardless of their political, professional or marital positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2011/04/02/in-statism-and-in-health-should-government-define-marriage/11513/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul and Jim DeMint unite for Rand Paul</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2010/10/03/ron-paul-and-jim-demint-unite-for-rand-paul/10744/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2010/10/03/ron-paul-and-jim-demint-unite-for-rand-paul/10744/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris wallace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commonalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox affiliates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox news sunday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foxnews com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund raiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[half hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hmmm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack conway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim demint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protesters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=10744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again Jim DeMint and Ron Paul have formed a coalition. They have worked hard on getting a full Federal Reserve audit and share many commonalities on economic issues. Now they come together for a campaign fund raiser for Ron Paul&#8217;s son, Rand Paul in Kentucky. Hmmm I wonder if DeMint and Ron Paul discussed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again Jim DeMint and Ron Paul have formed a coalition. They have worked hard on getting a full Federal Reserve audit and share many commonalities on economic issues. Now they come together for a campaign fund raiser for Ron Paul&#8217;s son, Rand Paul in Kentucky. Hmmm I wonder if DeMint and Ron Paul discussed any plans of forming another coalition for 2012 <a href="http://libertymaven.com/2010/09/16/poll-jim-demint-ron-paul-vs-obama-biden-in-2012/10658/">as suggested in our recent poll</a>.</p>
<p>The local media <a href="http://capitalistbanner.com/2010/10/03/moveon-org-leader-steals-media-spotlight-at-rand-paul-rally/">focused on the small number of protesters</a> at the event rather than the event itself.</p>
<p>In less than one hour from the time of this writing, Rand Paul and Jack Conway will appear together with Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday for a nationally televised debate. The debate has no rules and will comprise the first half-hour of the show. It airs at 9am Eastern on most local Fox affiliates. The latest polls still show Rand Paul with a lead in the race.</p>
<p><script src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4357448&amp;w=466&amp;h=263" type="text/javascript"></script><noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2010/10/03/ron-paul-and-jim-demint-unite-for-rand-paul/10744/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Tell If You&#8217;ve Had Too Much Politics</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2010/10/03/how-to-tell-if-youve-had-too-much-politics/10740/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2010/10/03/how-to-tell-if-youve-had-too-much-politics/10740/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clyde James Aragon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fund Raising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben bernanke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign buttons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign commercials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign flyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign signs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car red]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e mail account]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electroshock therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flyer distributors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hatch act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heady stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart to heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polling companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tattoo artist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombieland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=10740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about now you, as an American voter, are reaching critical political mass. Pummeled by incessant TV, radio, and newspaper ads, and deluged by dinnertime taped phone calls you want to kill the next person who brings up the election. Then, again, you may have crossed over into that Zombieland of voting in which you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about now you, as an American voter, are reaching critical political mass. Pummeled by incessant TV, radio, and newspaper ads, and deluged by dinnertime taped phone calls you want to kill the next person who brings up the election.</p>
<p>Then, again, you may have crossed over into that Zombieland of voting in which you can&#8217;t seem to get enough of the heady stuff. While the former state is normal, here&#8217;s how to tell if you&#8217;ve really had too much politics for the season and are badly in need of a vacation or at least electroshock therapy:</p>
<p>1) You know Sarah Palin&#8217;s dog&#8217;s favorite color.<br />
2) You can recite the Hatch Act from memory.<br />
3) You call polling companies and beg to be polled.<br />
4) You can&#8217;t wait for TV shows to end so you can start enjoying the campaign commercials.<br />
5) You&#8217;ve come to believe that Rand Paul is a type of gold coin.<br />
6) You can spell Ben Bernanke&#8217;s name forward AND backwards.<br />
7) Your shirt has color-coded campaign buttons with Republicans on the right side, Democrats on the left, and Libertarians down the middle.<br />
 <img src='http://libertymaven.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> You agree with every political view no matter who holds it yet become irritated when someone refuses to have an opinion.<br />
9) Your Favorites menu on your computer browser is full of campaign websites.<br />
10) You can&#8217;t be reached on the Internet because your e-mail account is glutted with campaign spam.<br />
11) You&#8217;ve got a space reserved in front of the early voting place so that you can get there before midnight.<br />
12) You&#8217;ve got a tattoo of your favorite candidate on your shoulder and you were the tattoo artist.<br />
13) You&#8217;ve painted half your car red and the other half blue.<br />
14) You invite campaign flyer distributors into your house for coffee and cookies and to have a heart-to-heart.<br />
15) You&#8217;ve removed the heads from your bobblehead collection and replaced them with leading candidates.<br />
16) You straighten up campaign signs at intersections.<br />
17) Your alarm clock has campaign ads to awaken you.<br />
18) You call radio talk shows just to hear them breathe.<br />
19) Instead of Fantasy Football, you play Fantasy Politics.<br />
20) Your friends avoid you because all you want to talk about is the latest polling numbers.<br />
21) When you dream, it&#8217;s of filling out your ballot.<br />
22) Your iPod is full of recorded campaign speeches.<br />
23) You&#8217;re disappointed when, after the phone rings, it&#8217;s only your mother calling and not a pre-recorded message from a local candidate.<br />
24) You burned out your TIVO recording late-night political shows.<br />
25) Your car has so many campaign stickers on it, it makes two miles less per gallon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2010/10/03/how-to-tell-if-youve-had-too-much-politics/10740/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate in the name of Liberty with this new iPhone App</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2010/09/21/debate-in-the-name-of-liberty-with-this-new-iphone-app/10685/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2010/09/21/debate-in-the-name-of-liberty-with-this-new-iphone-app/10685/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arch nemesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itouch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public battles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voice comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=10685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This looks like fun. There&#8217;s a pretty cool new iPhone app that liberty-lovers can use to help &#8220;educate&#8221; the government-loving statists out there. Maybe you can even debate well enough to get them to see that the Constitution should apply in all cases rather than only when it is convenient. Here are the details from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like fun. There&#8217;s a pretty cool new iPhone app that liberty-lovers can use to help &#8220;educate&#8221; the government-loving statists out there. Maybe you can even debate well enough to get them to see that the Constitution should apply in all cases rather than only when it is convenient.</p>
<p>Here are the details from the VingTalk Press Release:</p>
<p><em>ParTea America gives you the opportunity to debate friends or your political arch-nemesis during this political season</em></p>
<p><em>(September XX, 2010) LOS ANGELES – Argue politics and debate the critical issues affecting your community and nation with the ParTea America iPhone and iTouch Application. ParTea America brings the Battle to Politics and is available RIGHT NOW in the AppStore and iTunes. ParTea America is brought to you by VingTalk Inc.</em></p>
<p><em>Sign in and start a new battle. Record your opinion and argue back and forth with a friend or rival! Listen to other public battles and leave text or voice comments. Cast your vote for the best ideas, debates and arguments.</em></p>
<p><em>Any number of recordings may be added to the battle at anytime – allowing for an infinite amount of retorts and responses between the two users. The best battles are then selected for the Featured Section of the application.</em></p>
<p><em> <strong>ParTea America is available for FREE for a limited time through iTunes and the iPhone App Store</strong>. Go to: <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/partea/id389300035?mt=8" target="_self">http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/partea/id389300035?mt=8</a> or search ‘ParTea’.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2010/09/21/debate-in-the-name-of-liberty-with-this-new-iphone-app/10685/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questions, Questions, Questions</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2010/09/17/questions-questions-questions/10672/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2010/09/17/questions-questions-questions/10672/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clyde James Aragon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics/Banking/Money/Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candy shop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbo report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional representative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elevator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign countries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islamic mosques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicare prescription coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new mexico district]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican challenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaker nancy pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truncheon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=10672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, Martin Heinrich, the man who purports to represent me and the rest of my New Mexico district in the House of Representatives, refused to debate his Republican challenger Jon Barela on KOAT-TV. In this case, Mr. Heinrich was trying to confine the debate to questions he could honestly answer, which these days seems to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, Martin Heinrich, the man who purports to represent me and the rest of my New Mexico district in the House of Representatives, refused to debate his Republican challenger Jon Barela on KOAT-TV. In this case, Mr. Heinrich was trying to confine the debate to questions he could honestly answer, which these days seems to be limited to his name and age.</p>
<p>This is rather typical of New Mexico&#8217;s Democrat politicians and from what I read on Liberty Maven, the Internet, and in newspapers, about what you can expect of them wherever you live in our wonderful country. While adroit at stabbing us in the back with every tax and regulation they dream up, darn if you can find them whenever you want them to explain their actions.</p>
<p>So if your congressional representative is like Mr. Heinrich (and he or she can be of either party as I see them these days), may I proffer a few questions you might ask if you suddenly run into yours in a restaurant, an elevator, or an airport candy shop:</p>
<p>Why did you pass Obamacare without reading it (and if you say you read it, why did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi say &#8220;it had to be passed to see what was in it&#8221;)?</p>
<p>Why, under  Obamacare, after being told Americans could keep the insurance they like, are seniors being forced to switch Medicare prescription coverage because the federal government is eliminating choices for them?</p>
<p>Why did you lie to us about the real cost of Obamacare which changes with every CBO report?</p>
<p>Why did you pass a near-trillion dollar stimulus package that, instead of being used to create jobs, has been used to prop up bloated governments across the country?</p>
<p>Why, before the stimulus was passed, were we promised, cross-my-heart-or-hope-to-die, that unemployment would absolutely, positively stop at eight percent?</p>
<p>Why have U.S. tax dollars (actually, more American debt on our children&#8217;s backs) been used to rebuild Islamic mosques in foreign countries?</p>
<p>Why is the Justice Department being used as a political truncheon to harass and silence any state or person who disagrees with the Obama administration?</p>
<p>Why do you even want to consider passing job-killing cap-and-trade legislation?</p>
<p>And, finally, Mr. Representative-who-I-never-ever-see-in-this-state-unless-you’re-running-for-re-election, could you please explain to me how trillion dollar deficits are going to help this country?</p>
<p>Remember these simple queries, my friends, because running into elected officials by accident may be the only way we ever come into contact with the gods of Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2010/09/17/questions-questions-questions/10672/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On The Sidewalk</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2010/04/15/on-the-sidewalk/9559/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2010/04/15/on-the-sidewalk/9559/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 02:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clyde James Aragon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[campaign for liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriot act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angry mobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad direction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breaking things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foul language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obscene gestures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party rally]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pillaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rallies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rallys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rear ends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[setting fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidewalk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water bottle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young lady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=9559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like many free Americans who want to stay that way, I was at a Tea Party rally on April 15th. I&#8217;m not a card-carrying member of that group but I agree with them wholeheartedly on the bad direction this country is taking under the Obama regime. So I picked a spot on the sidewalk on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many free Americans who want to stay that way, I was at a Tea Party rally on April 15th. I&#8217;m not a card-carrying member of that group but I agree with them wholeheartedly on the bad direction this country is taking under the Obama regime. So I picked a spot on the sidewalk on Menaul Boulevard at 4 in the afternoon, brandished my sign, yelled a bit, waved a bit, and said what had to be said. For the most part, the event was very, very peaceful except for a young lady who stopped at the light and tried to share the water she had with her in her environmentally-friendly and recyclable water bottle. I was deeply dismayed for it appeared she was far more in need of a shower than any of us.</p>
<p dir="ltr">But it is the difference between conservatives and those on the Left that we tend not to make horse&#8217;s rear ends of ourselves at rallies and protests. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever read of a single conservative riot, no angry mobs of grown-ups running down the street overturning cars, setting fire to buildings, breaking windows, pillaging, and looting. But every time I see rallies on the Left, there they are obstructing traffic, breaking things, making their presence known through obscene gestures and foul language. None of that was in evidence at this day&#8217;s Tea Party protest.</p>
<p dir="ltr">We voiced our opinions on Mr. Obama, federal spending, politicians who won&#8217;t listen to us, liberty, freedom, the Constitution, you name it, we wrote it on out signs and discussed it with one another as the time passed. A finer group of people I could never find myself around. Thoughtful, opinionated, and, most importantly, intelligent.</p>
<p dir="ltr">We came, we made our point, and if the powers that be still won&#8217;t take notice of what we have to say, they&#8217;ll hear from us again this November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2010/04/15/on-the-sidewalk/9559/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent Challenger for Congress Invites Dent and Callahan to Debate</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/11/09/independent-challenger-for-congress-invites-dent-and-callahan-to-debate/7954/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2009/11/09/independent-challenger-for-congress-invites-dent-and-callahan-to-debate/7954/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake Towne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOX news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=7954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jake Towne issues a press release challenging incumbent Charlie Dent and challenger John Callahan to debate Originally published November 8, 2009 at http://towneforcongress.com/economy/towne-for-congress-invites-dent-and-callahan-to-debate-2 For immediate release Jake Towne, running as an independent private citizen for United States Congress in Pennsylvania&#8217;s 15th District encompassing the Lehigh Valley and parts of Berks and Montgomery counties challenged Republican [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;"><strong>Jake Towne issues a press release challenging incumbent Charlie Dent and challenger John Callahan to debate</strong></span></h2>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight: normal;">Originally published November 8, 2009 at </span><a href="http://towneforcongress.com/economy/towne-for-congress-invites-dent-and-callahan-to-debate-2" target="_self">http://towneforcongress.com/economy/towne-for-congress-invites-dent-and-callahan-to-debate-2</a></em></p>
<p><img class="alignright" style="border-style: none; margin: 10px;" src="http://towneforcongress.com/uploads/image/pic_jaketowne%286%29.jpg" alt="" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="148" height="165" align="right" /></p>
<div><em>For immediate release</em></div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Jake Towne, running as an independent private citizen for United States Congress in Pennsylvania&#8217;s 15<sup>th</sup> District encompassing the Lehigh Valley and parts of Berks and Montgomery counties challenged Republican incumbent Charlie Dent, and Democrat challenger John Callahan to a public debate on the issues facing the district and the nation.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">In his letter, Towne noted a great need for a healthy public debate on topics ranging from our health care, the wars abroad, the economy, and the stability of the dollar. He related that many people in the district are hurting financially, and they want answers from their candidates for government now.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Towne is a Lehigh Valley native raised in Nazareth and holds a chemical engineering degree from Lehigh University. He returned home earlier this year from a nearly 4-year stint in Shanghai, China working in the semiconductor industry to run for Congress. His experiences living abroad have given him a deep appreciation for America&#8217;s freedoms and quality of life.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Towne strongly believes that the actions of career politicians in Washington, DC, are leading our country down a path of both moral and economic ruin. He has created a novel-yet-simple plan of transparent and accountable government called the &#8220;Our Open Office&#8221; concept which can be read in detail at the campaign website, www.TowneForCongress.com.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Last week Towne raised over $2700 from 74 donors in a single day in an online &#8220;money bomb&#8221; created by grassroots supporters not affiliated with the campaign. This week he will be interviewed by Judge Napolitano at the FOX News studios in New York. Two weeks ago, Towne was part of a panel of FOX&#8217;s Freedom Watch show taped on the campus of Drexel University. Towne extends an invitation to any local group to invite him to meet their members, listen to their concerns, and explain his campaign. Talks given to past groups can be viewed at <a href="http://towneforcongress.com/lots-more/campaign-speeches-and-talks">[link edited for length]</a>.</p>
<p style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal;"><span id="more-7954"></span>Contact: Campaign Manager Jessica Roth</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; widows: 2; orphans: 2;" align="LEFT">Email: <a href="mailto:TowneForCongress@gmail.com">[link edited for length]</a></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; widows: 2; orphans: 2;" align="LEFT">Website: TowneForCongress.com</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">November 8, 2009</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Dear Congressman Dent and Mayor Callahan -</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">I respectfully challenge either of you to a debate concerning our congressional race. I am open to either one-on-one debate or debating both of you at the same time.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">While I can understand a reluctance on your parts to a debate so early before the November 2010 election – and that since you both are members of political parties that use the optional primary system so additional challengers are still possible – there is a great need for a public discourse on the troubles facing our nation. We are the only three candidates currently registered with the FEC.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">The times we live in are not normal. The dollar is in crisis and unemployment is rampant. Civil liberties are restricted more with each passing day. We have apparently endless wars continuing in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. I am traveling the district and the people are hurting. Congress&#8217;s solutions of more spending through the stimulus plan and more taxation via the Cap and Trade bill on energy and even our health care seem dubious at best.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Regardless of our differences in views as candidates, we owe it to the public to debate on these issues. Mayor Callahan, per the FEC you began your campaign on July 31, 2009. As of today, your website only contains an email sign-up. Why have you been unable to provide a website to the people with your stances on the critical topics facing our nation after 3.5 months as a candidate?</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Congressional races should not be similar to sports teams duking out a popularity contest, we should have a healthy debate on the issues – for the good of the PEOPLE.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Reply if you like by simply confirming whether you are open to one-on-one debate with me, or a group debate between the three of us FEC-registered candidates, or both. After the next ten business days, I will deem no reply as a negative to both questions.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Respectfully,</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Jake Towne</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; widows: 2; orphans: 2;">2010 Candidate for US Congress, PA-15<br />
Liberty, Sound Money, the Rule of Law, and Accountability<br />
TowneForCongress.com</p>
<p>&#8220;If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace.&#8221; – Thomas Paine, &#8220;The American Crisis,&#8221; 1776</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">_______________________________________________________________________</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><em>Jake Towne is running for U.S. Congress in Pennsylvania&#8217;s 15th District in the 2010 election as a citizen unaffiliated with any political parties. Jake also writes at <a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="../" target="_blank">www.LibertyMaven.com</a>, <a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/author481.html">www.NolanChart.com</a> and <a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?author=3" target="_blank">www.CampaignForLiberty.com</a>. A novel campaign website where you can comment on articles and start discussions is available at <a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://towneforcongress.com/">TowneForCongress.com</a>. </em><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="mailto:jaketowne@gmail.com" target="_blank"><em>[Reach the Author Here!]</em></a></em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">_______________________________________________________________________</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.2in;"><em><strong>We the People</strong></em> <em>of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.2in;"><em>As always, unlike the NFL, the author grants full permission to allow any accounts of, rebroadcasts, retransmissions, repostings of this article to your blog or anywhere else in order to promote the Restoration of our Republic.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.2in;"><em>Veritas numquam perit. Veritas odit moras. </em><em><strong>Veritas vincit</strong></em><em>. Truth never perishes. Truth hates delay. Truth conquers</em>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.2in;"><em>Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito. <strong>Do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it.</strong></em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.2in;">_______________________________________________________________________</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Other Recent Articles by the Author</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: aqua;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6986.html">Jake Towne to Nancy Pelosi &#8211; Are YOU Serious?</a><br />
</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6972.html">Abolish the Federal Department of Education!!!</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6961.html">Jake Towne&#8217;s Iraq War Plank</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6919.html">On the Dollar &#8211; Congressman Charlie Dent Answers a Question from Jake Towne</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6916.html">America&#8217;s Military Empire (UPDATED)</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6898.html"><em><strong>THE OPEN OFFICE &#8211; An Open Letter to Congressman Dent</strong></em></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6882.html"><strong>Jake Towne&#8217;s Bailout and Corporatism Plank</strong></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6863.html"><strong>Jake Towne&#8217;s Veterans Plank</strong></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a style="text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold; color: blue;" href="http://www.nolanchart.com/article6828.html">Jake Towne&#8217;s Plank on the Federal Reserve</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2009/11/09/independent-challenger-for-congress-invites-dent-and-callahan-to-debate/7954/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Hits: Obama&#8217;s Forbidden Question, Rand Paul, Cap and Trade, Guns, and Random Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/03/quick-hits-obamas-forbidden-question-rand-paul-cap-and-trade-guns-and-random-thoughts/6346/</link>
		<comments>http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/03/quick-hits-obamas-forbidden-question-rand-paul-cap-and-trade-guns-and-random-thoughts/6346/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Gallagher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maven Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional black caucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional scholar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fund raiser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genius move]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care question]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[helen thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huge news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moment of silence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nice ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary robert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[section article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senator rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=6346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s Friday and that means it&#8217;s time for another installment of  &#8220;Quick Hits&#8221;. Helen Thomas and Chip Reid berated White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs the other day for pre-selecting questions for Obama&#8217;s &#8220;town hall&#8221; and &#8220;controlling&#8221; the press. It appears that the honeymoon (I call it the &#8220;Obamagasm&#8221;) is coming to an end. Gibbs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Friday and that means it&#8217;s time for another installment of  &#8220;Quick Hits&#8221;.</p>
<p>Helen Thomas and Chip Reid <a title="Chip Reid and Helen Thomas grill Robert Gibbs for controlling the press" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q37kt0ga0OA" target="_self">berated White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs the other day</a> for pre-selecting questions for Obama&#8217;s &#8220;town hall&#8221; and &#8220;controlling&#8221; the press. It appears that the honeymoon (I call it the &#8220;Obamagasm&#8221;) is coming to an end. Gibbs seems to be out of his league as Obama&#8217;s Press Secretary. I&#8217;ll be surprised if he makes it through Obama&#8217;s first and hopefully only term.</p>
<p>There is one particular forbidden health care question for Obama. I would love to hear his answer to the following question:</p>
<p>&#8220;Mr. President, you are considered a Constitutional scholar. Could you educate the American people a bit and tell them what section, article, or amendment permits the federal government to provide health care?&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure, he would dodge the question, but it is one dodge that I long to hear.</p>
<p>On Monday, Ron Paul&#8217;s son Rand Paul held another money bomb campaign fund raiser. The goal was to break $100k. <a title="Like Father Like Son from CQ Politics" href="http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/eyeon2010/2009/07/like-father-like-son-kentucky.html" target="_self">The goal was met</a>. This is huge news and a great sign that the Ron Paul wing of the Republican Party is not going anywhere. Rand Paul raised over $100,000 in about a month without an official fund raiser. <em>Senator Rand Paul</em> has a nice ring to it.</p>
<p>There was high drama last Friday afternoon on the House floor during the debate on the narrowly passed Cap and Trade bill. The Republicans kept pointing out that the legislation will lose more jobs and put a higher tax burden on the American people.</p>
<p><span id="more-6346"></span></p>
<p>Prior to the Cap and Trade debate <a title="Moment of Silence for Michael Jackson" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0609/24260.html" target="_self">members of the Congressional Black Caucus requested a moment of silence for Michael Jackson</a>, who died the day before (as we all know). The request was granted. Later, during the Cap and Trade debate <a title="Moment of silence for jobs lost due to Energy Bill" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEwCqp6vhrc" target="_self">Tom Price (R-GA) requested a moment of silence for all of the people who will lose their jobs due to the bill</a>. The Democrats objected. No moment of silence was held. This was a genius move by Price to demonstrate that the Democrats seem to care more about a dead pop star than thousands of American jobs. Unfortunately and unsurprisingly, most of the news outlets didn&#8217;t make the connection.</p>
<p>In more <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">local</span> personal news I purchased <a title="Springfield XDm" href="http://the-m-factor/" target="_self">my first handgun</a> for my birthday (yesterday). I took an NRA class a few months ago in preparation for owning a firearm. It feels damn good to rack the slide on that 2nd Amendment. Now I join millions of other gun owners searching for scarce ammo at reasonable prices.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe we&#8217;ll see any fundamental action from Obama on gun control for awhile (if ever). The path he must travel toward gun control is littered with political land mines, <a title="65 Democrats tell Obama &quot;NO&quot; on gun control" href="http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/6589" target="_self">some of them placed there by his own party</a>. Then again so is immigration reform and he is starting to kick up the dust on that again.</p>
<p>And now a few random thoughts and quotes for the week:</p>
<ul>
<li>When it comes to paying attention to the unraveling of America, ignorance is not bliss, it is willful neglect.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>If I turn on the news tomorrow and hear anything about Michael Jackson I&#8217;m going to moonwalk off a cliff!</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Will it take 99 more Al Frankens winning for Americans to wake up and realize their govmt is a joke?</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed. &#8211; Sarah Brady</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;A woman who demands further gun control legislation is like a chicken who roots for Colonel Sanders.&#8221; &#8211; Larry Elder</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;I ask you sir, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people.&#8221; &#8211; George Mason</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>One of my favorite gun rights bumper stickers: Guns only have two enemies: rust and politicians.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>White House to offer new breakfast cereal: Obamaganda. Ad slogan: &#8220;Obamagasms for Obamaganda: A free carbon credit in every box!&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Senate version of Cap and Trade will probably have a provision forcing everyone to hold their breath for 60 min/day.</li>
</ul>
<p>Have a great Independence Day weekend!</p>
<p>May the number of fingers on your hand today equal the number of fingers on your hand on Sunday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/03/quick-hits-obamas-forbidden-question-rand-paul-cap-and-trade-guns-and-random-thoughts/6346/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

