CPAC Day 1: Bold Rand Paul and too-bold Ron Paul supporters?

February 10th, 2011 11:13 pm  |  by  |  Published in Activism, campaign for liberty, Constitution, Election, Federal Reserve, foreign aid, Foreign Policy, Individual Responsibility, Libertarianism, Liberty, Maven Commentary, Neo-con, Politics, Rand Paul, Ron Paul, Thomas Woods  |  7 Responses

There are cerebral strategists and balls-to-the-wall activists in the tent of Ron Paul. Both were evident at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) today. Prior to Rand Paul’s stellar speech the surprise speaker was Donald Trump. Many of us in the audience had come to get our seats to see The Rand instead of The Donald, and things got a bit ugly.

During Trump’s speech there were some vocal activists shouting out Ron Paul’s name, among other things. At one point when Trump mentioned there were no good GOP candidates the shouts of Ron Paul became too much for him. The video below shows what happened:

Yes, the out-of-touch celebrity with lots of money reacts by telling the crowd that Ron Paul has zero chance of winning. I immediately said something that was later echoed by Rand Paul, “Trump has an even less of a chance of winning than Ron Paul”. That was only the beginning.

Next, Rand Paul delivered his excellent speech highlighted by the following quote, “If you refuse to acknowledge that there’s any waste in the military budget, you are a big government conservative.” Watch Rand Paul’s entire speech here.

Immediately following Rand Paul’s speech, it was time for the presentation of the Defender of the Constitution award to none other than Donald Rumsfeld. Giving Rummy this award is the equivalent of giving Ron Paul the Warmonger of the Year award. It truly boggles the mind. This was, naturally, not lost on the Ron Paul faithful still in the ballroom. Some loud boos were heard. Some shouts of “war monger” were heard. And a great number of people just stood up and walked silently out of the room in protest.

My initial take on this is that it’s OK to boo and shout from the point of introduction up to the point where the speech begins. Then the respectful thing to do would be to be silent or walk out silently. The minute you interfere with their speech you are being a thief of free speech and that’s not very libertarian is it?

However, this is Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld we are talking about. Do they deserve respect? Perhaps if they respected human liberty and actually defended the Constitution those boos today would have been cheers instead.

After dinner we attended the Liberty Forum with Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Jack Hunter, and Thomas Woods. It was a laid-back affair and enjoyable but was without the fiery speeches that marked last year’s Liberty Forum at CPAC when Judge Andrew Napolitano brought the house down with his great speech. I for one missed the Judge tonight.

Day 1 of CPAC was quite eventful. I’m sure tomorrow will bring more interesting moments. Ron Paul speaks in the main ballroom tomorrow afternoon and the cerebral strategists and the balls-to-the-wall activists will be there to applaud, cheer, or jeer. No matter what the media writes or other conservatives say, the goal will always be to promote liberty in the best way they as individuals see fit. And no matter the results, at least they are out here doing something for the cause of freedom.

Responses

  1. JKR says:

    February 10th, 2011 at 11:29 pm (#)

    Rand did not say Trump had an 'even' less chance of winning than his Dad, he said Trumps chance was less than his Dad's.

    The former would imply Ron doesn't have much of a chance to win. We know Trump hasn't, but by baiting for headlines, I think it is pretty clear that isn't Trumps purpose there, in any event.

  2. AngelaTC says:

    February 11th, 2011 at 12:10 am (#)

    Just call me Miss Manners, but it is never ok to boo. And of course they don't deserve our respect, but Ron Paul has asked us to always be respectful.

  3. marcg says:

    February 11th, 2011 at 1:14 am (#)

    Yes, I know. I was the one who said the quote right after Trump said what he said… Rand's was a bit different a bit later.

  4. James says:

    February 11th, 2011 at 3:24 am (#)

    The link to the judges speech is from last year.

  5. marcg says:

    February 11th, 2011 at 4:14 am (#)

    Yes. it is. The Judge was not at CPAC this year.

  6. lester says:

    February 11th, 2011 at 10:31 am (#)

    Who was the geniues who had Rand Paul going on after rumsfeld? Why was Rumsfeld given a award for which he appears to have done absolutely nothing to earn? Just so he can promote his memoirs? It's like the organizers don't even care about this hting

  7. Joe Biden says:

    February 11th, 2011 at 4:15 pm (#)

    Perhaps they meant the "defender of the North Korean constitution" award?

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.