Liberty MavenAmerica, where it’s all Ron Paul, all the time.
February 24th, 2010 10:20 pm | by Marc Gallagher | Published in Bailouts, Big Government, Civil Liberties, congress, Constitution, Debt, Economics, Federal Reserve, Foreign Policy, government spending, Ron Paul, terrorism, torture, War | 6 Responses
In case you missed it, Ron Paul had some time for his favorite pastime today, questioning the Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke. Then later he enjoyed a relaxing speech on the House floor where he took the obviously crazy position that the U.S. government shouldn’t be assassinating Americans.
First, his opening speech and questioning of Bernanke.
httpvp://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=1085FB9C42A58EDF
And then, Paul’s floor speech against American assassinations.
Loading ...
February 25th, 2010 at 4:07 am (#)
Since some don't know the background of Ron's questions to Bernanke (the ones Bernanke flipped out over and called 'bizarre') they might want to look at the many links in the comment section to this article. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/…
All the more reason we need an audit of the fed
February 25th, 2010 at 4:07 am (#)
Since some don't know the background of Ron's questions to Bernanke (the ones Bernanke flipped out over and called 'bizarre') they might want to look at the many links in the comment section to this article. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/…
All the more reason we need an audit of the fed
February 25th, 2010 at 3:16 pm (#)
Also, one could check into the writings of Matthias Chang. These brave attempts to acquire or expose the truth are often responded to in a similar manner Bernanke displayed, ie: "Conspiracy Theorists". Such reactions could be construed as collaboration. I fear it will take many brave patriots to stop such an agenda or we will lose what liberty we have left.
February 25th, 2010 at 4:07 pm (#)
The entire involvement of the Fed centers on the possession of sequential crisp bills by the bugulars and Sadam.
When the Fed issues new bills into circulation it does so in such a format by delivering fresh bills to a member bank. What the bank does with those bills is another matter. Any person receiving cash from a bank is capable of receiving sequential bills. That also holds for another bank receiving cash from a bank that received cash from the Fed, etc, etc.
So essentially all that can be known for certain is that the bills were kept in mint condition from the Fed to the final holders, in this case the Watergate bugulars and Sadam. The chain of possession is unclear.
Perhaps the Fed could shed some light on the first link in that chain, but it seems like little else could be done.
February 25th, 2010 at 10:13 pm (#)
To Guest, but the Fed refused to discuss it.
Ron Paul's questions weren't about Watergate or Saddam as issues in themselves, they were about Fed transparency, and the need for an audit mechanism.
February 25th, 2010 at 10:13 pm (#)
To Guest, but the Fed refused to discuss it.
Ron Paul's questions weren't about Watergate or Saddam as issues in themselves, they were about Fed transparency, and the need for an audit mechanism.