Comments on: Judge Napolitano on Justice Alito’s “Not True” Moment http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/ For Liberty, One Individual At A Time Fri, 18 May 2012 14:27:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Chad http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6200 Chad Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:39:18 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6200 A couple of things. Ever think of calling the companies and asking them to take you off of their mailing list? How about changing the channel? Those are the ways to tune out others without getting all Fascistic on the subject. A couple of things.

Ever think of calling the companies and asking them to take you off of their mailing list?

How about changing the channel?

Those are the ways to tune out others without getting all Fascistic on the subject.

]]> By: charrob http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6179 charrob Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:54:35 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6179 part 3 of 3: -like other Americans who honor the Constitution, I understand the premise but am disgusted by monied interests constantly corrupting our politics. I'm tired of seeing qualified candidates overlooked and who are never heard simply because they are drowned out by big-monied interests. I don't know what the answer is, but there's got to be some way to accomplish this without changing the Constitution. And there's got to be some way of not hearing the free speech of those we don't want to hear -- any ideas? part 3 of 3:
-like other Americans who honor the Constitution, I understand the premise but am disgusted by monied interests constantly corrupting our politics. I'm tired of seeing qualified candidates overlooked and who are never heard simply because they are drowned out by big-monied interests. I don't know what the answer is, but there's got to be some way to accomplish this without changing the Constitution. And there's got to be some way of not hearing the free speech of those we don't want to hear — any ideas?

]]> By: charrob http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6182 charrob Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:54:35 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6182 part 3 of 3: -like other Americans who honor the Constitution, I understand the premise but am disgusted by monied interests constantly corrupting our politics. I'm tired of seeing qualified candidates overlooked and who are never heard simply because they are drowned out by big-monied interests. I don't know what the answer is, but there's got to be some way to accomplish this without changing the Constitution. And there's got to be some way of not hearing the free speech of those we don't want to hear -- any ideas? part 3 of 3:
-like other Americans who honor the Constitution, I understand the premise but am disgusted by monied interests constantly corrupting our politics. I'm tired of seeing qualified candidates overlooked and who are never heard simply because they are drowned out by big-monied interests. I don't know what the answer is, but there's got to be some way to accomplish this without changing the Constitution. And there's got to be some way of not hearing the free speech of those we don't want to hear — any ideas?

]]> By: charrob http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6180 charrob Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:54:08 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6180 part 2 of 3: -as for those who want to learn about their candidates via television broadcast rather than reading about them, why not claim our rights on the public broadcast spectrum we own? -why not tell the broadcast monopolies that in order to license such and such a frequency that, say, two months prior to an election that they need to allocate the 8pm to 10pm timeframes, Monday through Friday, to public forums that give equal blocks of time for all candidates during election season to speak about issues and debate one another? -that these primetime broadcasts shall have no commercials, and that the public be made aware that these are special timeframes in which the networks have no control? Candidates allowed into these forums should meet some <given> threshold of public support and no third party candidates shall be denied entry into the forums if that threshold is met. (note: the threshold does not have to be related to money). part 2 of 3:
-as for those who want to learn about their candidates via television broadcast rather than reading about them, why not claim our rights on the public broadcast spectrum we own? -why not tell the broadcast monopolies that in order to license such and such a frequency that, say, two months prior to an election that they need to allocate the 8pm to 10pm timeframes, Monday through Friday, to public forums that give equal blocks of time for all candidates during election season to speak about issues and debate one another? -that these primetime broadcasts shall have no commercials, and that the public be made aware that these are special timeframes in which the networks have no control? Candidates allowed into these forums should meet some <given> threshold of public support and no third party candidates shall be denied entry into the forums if that threshold is met. (note: the threshold does not have to be related to money).

]]> By: charrob http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6178 charrob Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:53:18 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6178 part 1 of 3: In effect, the court asked, “What part of ‘Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech’ does Congress not understand? -not sure about Congress, but the part I don't understand is why I can't listen to a chosen show on a television without constantly being interrupted by commercials I don't want to see. It's annoying. It's like opening my mailbox after one week and getting a whole armful of mail and, after painstakenly going through it to verify if anything important is lost somewhere in the middle of it, finding out there is only one letter that is not junk mail. I've gone to the post office three times to tell them I don't want junk mail yet every time they tell me that legally they are required to deliver it. Where's my freedom in not having to hear all the "free speech" I'm not interested in hearing (or seeing)? part 1 of 3:
In effect, the court asked, “What part of ‘Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech’ does Congress not understand? -not sure about Congress, but the part I don't understand is why I can't listen to a chosen show on a television without constantly being interrupted by commercials I don't want to see. It's annoying. It's like opening my mailbox after one week and getting a whole armful of mail and, after painstakenly going through it to verify if anything important is lost somewhere in the middle of it, finding out there is only one letter that is not junk mail. I've gone to the post office three times to tell them I don't want junk mail yet every time they tell me that legally they are required to deliver it. Where's my freedom in not having to hear all the "free speech" I'm not interested in hearing (or seeing)?

]]> By: charrob http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6181 charrob Sun, 31 Jan 2010 08:53:18 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6181 part 1 of 3: In effect, the court asked, “What part of ‘Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech’ does Congress not understand? -not sure about Congress, but the part I don't understand is why I can't listen to a chosen show on a television without constantly being interrupted by commercials I don't want to see. It's annoying. It's like opening my mailbox after one week and getting a whole armful of mail and, after painstakenly going through it to verify if anything important is lost somewhere in the middle of it, finding out there is only one letter that is not junk mail. I've gone to the post office three times to tell them I don't want junk mail yet every time they tell me that legally they are required to deliver it. Where's my freedom in not having to hear all the "free speech" I'm not interested in hearing (or seeing)? part 1 of 3:
In effect, the court asked, “What part of ‘Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech’ does Congress not understand? -not sure about Congress, but the part I don't understand is why I can't listen to a chosen show on a television without constantly being interrupted by commercials I don't want to see. It's annoying. It's like opening my mailbox after one week and getting a whole armful of mail and, after painstakenly going through it to verify if anything important is lost somewhere in the middle of it, finding out there is only one letter that is not junk mail. I've gone to the post office three times to tell them I don't want junk mail yet every time they tell me that legally they are required to deliver it. Where's my freedom in not having to hear all the "free speech" I'm not interested in hearing (or seeing)?

]]> By: Norbert http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6174 Norbert Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:59:40 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6174 The constitution is a D-bag. Duh... The constitution is a D-bag. Duh…

]]> By: Thane Eichenauer http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6172 Thane Eichenauer Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:30:37 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6172 <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=That's+not+true">That's not true</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=That's+not+true">That's not true

]]> By: Thane Eichenauer http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6173 Thane Eichenauer Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:30:37 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6173 <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=That's+not+true">That's not true</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=That's+not+true">That's not true

]]> By: George Washington http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6159 George Washington Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:28:57 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6159 Judge Alito is a D-Bag Judge Alito is a D-Bag

]]> By: Jerry Stone http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6158 Jerry Stone Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:49:17 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6158 I meant to type "inappropriate", not "unappropriate". I meant to type "inappropriate", not "unappropriate".

]]> By: Jerry Stone http://libertymaven.com/2010/01/29/judge-napolitano-on-justice-alitos-not-true-moment/8816/comment-page-1/#comment-6157 Jerry Stone Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:48:06 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8816#comment-6157 Who wrote the term, "snake oil salesman"? Unappropriate, rude, crude, and uncouth. Who wrote the term, "snake oil salesman"? Unappropriate, rude, crude, and uncouth.

]]>