Comments on: Would you like climate scientists to focus on science instead of politics? http://libertymaven.com/2009/12/04/would-you-like-climate-scientists-to-focus-on-science-instead-of-politics/8239/ For Liberty, One Individual At A Time Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:44:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: NO_O_n12 http://libertymaven.com/2009/12/04/would-you-like-climate-scientists-to-focus-on-science-instead-of-politics/8239/comment-page-1/#comment-5160 NO_O_n12 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:16:45 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8239#comment-5160 Defenders of catastrophic AGW claim that the e-mails do not invalidate their science.If it were only the released e-mails that cast doubt on the findings at the CRU in particular na dAHW in general CRU's position might be defensible. However, the other documents collectively and in conjunction with the e-mails are very incriminating. Especially considering that many of the criticisms of the whole AGW "science" that have been voiced for the past several years have been addressed and confirmed by the released files. I may be a 'flat earther' for having very serious doubts regarding AGW. However, I prefer the odds of falling off the edge of my flat earth to the prospects of a global government controlling every aspect of my life. Defenders of catastrophic AGW claim that the e-mails do not invalidate their science.If it were only the released e-mails that cast doubt on the findings at the CRU in particular na dAHW in general CRU's position might be defensible. However, the other documents collectively and in conjunction with the e-mails are very incriminating. Especially considering that many of the criticisms of the whole AGW "science" that have been voiced for the past several years have been addressed and confirmed by the released files.

I may be a 'flat earther' for having very serious doubts regarding AGW. However, I prefer the odds of falling off the edge of my flat earth to the prospects of a global government controlling every aspect of my life.

]]> By: NO_O_n12 http://libertymaven.com/2009/12/04/would-you-like-climate-scientists-to-focus-on-science-instead-of-politics/8239/comment-page-1/#comment-5161 NO_O_n12 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:16:45 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=8239#comment-5161 Defenders of catastrophic AGW claim that the e-mails do not invalidate their science.If it were only the released e-mails that cast doubt on the findings at the CRU in particular na dAHW in general CRU's position might be defensible. However, the other documents collectively and in conjunction with the e-mails are very incriminating. Especially considering that many of the criticisms of the whole AGW "science" that have been voiced for the past several years have been addressed and confirmed by the released files. I may be a 'flat earther' for having very serious doubts regarding AGW. However, I prefer the odds of falling off the edge of my flat earth to the prospects of a global government controlling every aspect of my life. Defenders of catastrophic AGW claim that the e-mails do not invalidate their science.If it were only the released e-mails that cast doubt on the findings at the CRU in particular na dAHW in general CRU's position might be defensible. However, the other documents collectively and in conjunction with the e-mails are very incriminating. Especially considering that many of the criticisms of the whole AGW "science" that have been voiced for the past several years have been addressed and confirmed by the released files.

I may be a 'flat earther' for having very serious doubts regarding AGW. However, I prefer the odds of falling off the edge of my flat earth to the prospects of a global government controlling every aspect of my life.

]]>