Comments on: Judge Napolitano pops the Health Care Constitutionality question

By: Constitution Denied Article (March 2010) | Const Denied Blog

Constitution Denied Article (March 2010) | Const Denied Blog — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:23:43 +0000

[...] James Clyburn, the 3rd highest democrat in the House of Representatives, in which Congressman Clyburn when asked about the constitutionality of healthcare stated that most of what they do in Congress is not authorized by the Constitution and when pressed [...]

By: Ending Social Security, Privatizing Retirement

Ending Social Security, Privatizing Retirement — Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:03:56 +0000

[...] defending the creation of “Obamacare” — yet another unsustainable government entitlement — a former Democratic Majority Whip summed up the prevailing sentiment when he said “there’s nothing in the Constitution that says the federal government has anything to do with [...]

By: James Clyburn: Sarah Palin Just Doesn’t Understand | Lee Hernly

James Clyburn: Sarah Palin Just Doesn’t Understand | Lee Hernly — Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:09:38 +0000

[...] blabber comes from a man who has a hard time understanding the Constitution himself and who thought that the GOP’s reading of the Constitution was somehow linked to the [...]

By: Obama Orders 1 Million US Troops to Prepare for Civil War

Obama Orders 1 Million US Troops to Prepare for Civil War — Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:40:22 +0000

[...] [...]

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:49:40 +0000

Democrats still think they can make heaven on earth . As long as they are so full of themselves, you'll never get any sense out of them.
Both Dems. and Rep. are selling us out for One World Govt. and people are too blind to see it.
All should be tried for Treason as they are not upholding the Law of the L:and- the U.S. Constitution. Doing so, they have abbrograted their own power thus contributing to anarchy.

By: Carolyn

Carolyn — Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:49:40 +0000

By: Democrats would rather spank Joe Wilson than follow the Constitution :: Liberty Maven

Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:43:32 +0000

[...] No, Jim. Elected officials like yourself should be following the supreme law of the land also known as the U.S. Constitution. Of course we know exactly how much you value that oath you took from your interview the other day with Judge Andrew Napolitano. [...]

By: Nate

Nate — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 23:51:31 +0000

Happily, as has been pointed out, this is not true. It is true that the Federal Government abuses these clauses in order to carry out their unconstitutional activities. But that is hardly the point. I mean, just think about it, what's the point of having a written constitution if the government is allowed to do whatever it deems "necessary and proper".

The 16th amendment is itself unconstitutional and should be repealed.

By: Angela

Angela — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 17:13:08 +0000

Junie, you're wrong. The general welfare clause applies to the states and not to the people. In other words, it allows for genera welfare, such as a shared miitary, but not specific welfare.

The SCOTUS ruled against your interpretation a majority of the time. It was only when FDR threatened them that they caved and reversed 150 years of precedent, and thus we began the downward slide into the special-interest driven, tyrannical system we have now.

By: Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Judge Napolitano Takes On No. 3 House Democrat On Constitutionality Of Obama Care

Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:49:15 +0000

[...] Napolitano took on Congressman James Clyburn, the No. 3 Democrat in the House, on his radio show yesterday: The Judge then pops the question: “Where in the Constitution is the federal government charged [...]

By: zack

zack — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:06:53 +0000

I heard this live on my morning commute, and was gripping the steering wheel with white-knuckled fury. I really despise that lightweight neocon nitwit Brian Kilmeade. He helped the Congressman get off the hook, though the Judge is way too classy to really stick it to Clyburn…

By: Anon

Anon — Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:19:30 +0000

State interposition and nullification