Comments on: Ron Paul: Still Crazy After All These Years http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/21/ron-paul-still-crazy-after-all-these-years/6395/ For Liberty, One Individual At A Time Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:44:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: IndyMatt http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/21/ron-paul-still-crazy-after-all-these-years/6395/comment-page-1/#comment-4552 IndyMatt Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:12:30 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=6395#comment-4552 But that's just it. There is no "debate". There is absolutely zero weight or validity to the truther argument. And treating it as if the two positions are on equal footing implicitly supports the truther position far more than the evidence supporting it should permit. But that's just it. There is no "debate". There is absolutely zero weight or validity to the truther argument. And treating it as if the two positions are on equal footing implicitly supports the truther position far more than the evidence supporting it should permit.

]]> By: Lifetime Country Club Member and RINO Ron Paul Calls Moose Hunting Palin a "Conventional Country Club Republican" | Politics News http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/21/ron-paul-still-crazy-after-all-these-years/6395/comment-page-1/#comment-3682 Lifetime Country Club Member and RINO Ron Paul Calls Moose Hunting Palin a "Conventional Country Club Republican" | Politics News Sat, 25 Jul 2009 05:02:55 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=6395#comment-3682 [...] posing as a Republican Ron Paul jumped on the attack Sarah Palin wagon in an interview with Politico this week saying Palin [...] [...] posing as a Republican Ron Paul jumped on the attack Sarah Palin wagon in an interview with Politico this week saying Palin [...]

]]> By: LibertarianMike http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/21/ron-paul-still-crazy-after-all-these-years/6395/comment-page-1/#comment-3598 LibertarianMike Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:41:21 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=6395#comment-3598 I tend to agree with vindician. I didn't see ANYTHING in his response that indicated that he accepted the "inside job" theory whatsoever. I just saw a man flustered by a question he wasn't prepared for (and, indeed, a question which clearly often annoys him). What I heard was basically, "I don't have time for this nonsense" but he tried to walk a thin line in his response so as not to alienate anyone on either side of the debate. I tend to agree with vindician. I didn't see ANYTHING in his response that indicated that he accepted the "inside job" theory whatsoever. I just saw a man flustered by a question he wasn't prepared for (and, indeed, a question which clearly often annoys him). What I heard was basically, "I don't have time for this nonsense" but he tried to walk a thin line in his response so as not to alienate anyone on either side of the debate.

]]> By: marcg http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/21/ron-paul-still-crazy-after-all-these-years/6395/comment-page-1/#comment-3597 marcg Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:36:23 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=6395#comment-3597 His response implied he accepted it but that he was too busy to "come out regarding the truth about 9/11". I'm obviously a huge Ron Paul supporter, but the fact is, his answer can EASILY be taken to mean he accepts the premise of the woman's question. As I stated in the article, it is most likely what he meant to say is more along the lines of what Harry Browne said in the audio I included. -Marc His response implied he accepted it but that he was too busy to "come out regarding the truth about 9/11".

I'm obviously a huge Ron Paul supporter, but the fact is, his answer can EASILY be taken to mean he accepts the premise of the woman's question.

As I stated in the article, it is most likely what he meant to say is more along the lines of what Harry Browne said in the audio I included.

-Marc

]]> By: vindician http://libertymaven.com/2009/07/21/ron-paul-still-crazy-after-all-these-years/6395/comment-page-1/#comment-3595 vindician Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:12:20 +0000 http://libertymaven.com/?p=6395#comment-3595 You have to be reaaaaaally creative (or paranoid, insane etc) to claim that Ron Paul "implicitly" accepted the notion that 9/11 was an inside job. He didn't even comment the question, and not even the woman asking the question talked about an inside job. Incomprehensible claim. You have to be reaaaaaally creative (or paranoid, insane etc) to claim that Ron Paul "implicitly" accepted the notion that 9/11 was an inside job. He didn't even comment the question, and not even the woman asking the question talked about an inside job.

Incomprehensible claim.

]]>