<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul&#8217;s HR1207 is Unstoppable! 207 Cosponsors now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/09/ron-pauls-hr1207-is-unstoppable-207-cosponsors-now/6062/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/09/ron-pauls-hr1207-is-unstoppable-207-cosponsors-now/6062/</link>
	<description>For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/09/ron-pauls-hr1207-is-unstoppable-207-cosponsors-now/6062/comment-page-1/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=6062#comment-3332</guid>
		<description>Anyone reading this, if you think it is a good idea, please call any congressman that is NOT on this list.  Democrat, republican, ind., it doesn&#039;t matter.  Call the office in D.C.  then call their local offices.  Get busy folks.  At this point they will have a very hard time saying no.  In fact, my congressman agreed to send me a letter stating his position on this, try to get yours to do the same, especially if they won&#039;t agree to it.   
 
Try something like this: 
 
Hi, I am a constituent and noticed that you, my congressman (or woman) has not yet signed on to co-sponsor H.R. 1207.  H.R. 1207 is a bill to bring a little transparency to the federal reserve.  With the latest crisis on Wall Street, I think we can all agree that transparency is a good thing, yes?  The bill is very short.  Just a few paragraphs.  Other congressmen in this state (if you can say that) have already jumped on the bandwagon.  Won&#039;t you please ask the congressman to join them?   
 
I would appreciate a short note explaining the congressman&#039;s position on this.  My address is .... 
 
 
It worked in my state.  The next day my congressman joined the group of co-sponsors.  But, I got the impression that if I hadn&#039;t made the call, his office never would have heard of this.  He was willing to be a co-sponsor, but his office had never heard of the bill.   
 
So, come on folks.  Get busy.  Let those folks out there know that you want them to support this bill.  If you get resistance, try shaming them into it.   
 
Something like: 
 
Look, this is just a bill to AUDIT the fed, not to control it in any way.  Surely you are not saying that we are all better off not knowing what the fed is doing with our money?  You can&#039;t be suggesting that hiding your head in the sand is better?  All this bill does is to allow us to know what the fed is up to.   How can you run this country if you don&#039;t know what is going on with our money?   
 
 
Good luck. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone reading this, if you think it is a good idea, please call any congressman that is NOT on this list.  Democrat, republican, ind., it doesn&#039;t matter.  Call the office in D.C.  then call their local offices.  Get busy folks.  At this point they will have a very hard time saying no.  In fact, my congressman agreed to send me a letter stating his position on this, try to get yours to do the same, especially if they won&#039;t agree to it.   </p>
<p>Try something like this: </p>
<p>Hi, I am a constituent and noticed that you, my congressman (or woman) has not yet signed on to co-sponsor H.R. 1207.  H.R. 1207 is a bill to bring a little transparency to the federal reserve.  With the latest crisis on Wall Street, I think we can all agree that transparency is a good thing, yes?  The bill is very short.  Just a few paragraphs.  Other congressmen in this state (if you can say that) have already jumped on the bandwagon.  Won&#039;t you please ask the congressman to join them?   </p>
<p>I would appreciate a short note explaining the congressman&#039;s position on this.  My address is &#8230;. </p>
<p>It worked in my state.  The next day my congressman joined the group of co-sponsors.  But, I got the impression that if I hadn&#039;t made the call, his office never would have heard of this.  He was willing to be a co-sponsor, but his office had never heard of the bill.   </p>
<p>So, come on folks.  Get busy.  Let those folks out there know that you want them to support this bill.  If you get resistance, try shaming them into it.   </p>
<p>Something like: </p>
<p>Look, this is just a bill to AUDIT the fed, not to control it in any way.  Surely you are not saying that we are all better off not knowing what the fed is doing with our money?  You can&#039;t be suggesting that hiding your head in the sand is better?  All this bill does is to allow us to know what the fed is up to.   How can you run this country if you don&#039;t know what is going on with our money?   </p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PainfullyAware</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/09/ron-pauls-hr1207-is-unstoppable-207-cosponsors-now/6062/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>PainfullyAware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=6062#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>The Federal Reserve Hiring A Lobbyist To Combat HR1207 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aZjQKyLci1AM&amp;refer=us&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;a...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
&quot;June 5 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve intends to hire a veteran lobbyist as it seeks to counter skepticism in Congress about the central bank&#8217;s growing power over the U.S. financial system, people familiar with the matter said. &quot; 
 
The article states they are considering Linda Robertson of Enron Lobbying Fame. She begins in July - Watch for waning support to begin when it becomes &quot;Lucrative&quot; to our &quot;Representatives&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Reserve Hiring A Lobbyist To Combat HR1207<br />
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aZjQKyLci1AM&amp;refer=us" target="_blank">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&#038;a&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>&quot;June 5 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The Federal Reserve intends to hire a veteran lobbyist as it seeks to counter skepticism in Congress about the central bank&rsquo;s growing power over the U.S. financial system, people familiar with the matter said. &quot; </p>
<p>The article states they are considering Linda Robertson of Enron Lobbying Fame. She begins in July &#8211; Watch for waning support to begin when it becomes &quot;Lucrative&quot; to our &quot;Representatives&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Moss</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/09/ron-pauls-hr1207-is-unstoppable-207-cosponsors-now/6062/comment-page-1/#comment-3320</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=6062#comment-3320</guid>
		<description>If the constitution says, &quot;Congress shall have power to coin money and regulate the value thereof&quot; How do you amend that without an amendment? And the Supreme court in 1935 said, &quot;Congress cannot abdicate it&#039;s duty and delegate to another group&quot; and the legal term, 
Stare Decisisi is applied. Vanishing cream to the Fed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the constitution says, &quot;Congress shall have power to coin money and regulate the value thereof&quot; How do you amend that without an amendment? And the Supreme court in 1935 said, &quot;Congress cannot abdicate it&#039;s duty and delegate to another group&quot; and the legal term,<br />
Stare Decisisi is applied. Vanishing cream to the Fed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

