<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Hits: Waterboarding HR1207, a new liberty candidate, Rand bombs, and random thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/05/quick-hits-waterboarding-hr1207-a-new-liberty-candidate-rand-bombs-and-random-thoughts/5999/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/05/quick-hits-waterboarding-hr1207-a-new-liberty-candidate-rand-bombs-and-random-thoughts/5999/</link>
	<description>For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/05/quick-hits-waterboarding-hr1207-a-new-liberty-candidate-rand-bombs-and-random-thoughts/5999/comment-page-1/#comment-3264</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5999#comment-3264</guid>
		<description>My understanding of the &quot;popularity&quot; of HR-1207 with so many Congressmen, is the little known fact that it is so limited in what it asks.  This bill does not ask for Federal Reserve foreign investment/transaction  audits, &amp; it does not ask for the revelation of the true owners of the FR &amp; how they personally benefit from it.  
 
In short, HR-1207 falls short of revealing what would be considered important public information. 
 
Will the off shore (Rothschild) control over America&#039;s currency be exposed in the debate itself? 
 
Let&#039;s hope so ! 
 
 Will the audit itself, expose the Federal Reserve&#039;s questionable investments in the futures trading market? 
 
It better ! 
 
Ron Paul has created a magnificent Trojan Horse bill, that has the public&#039;s attention &amp; is nearing majority Congressional support. The MSM will have a great deal of trouble lowering the profile on this one, once the debate begins, let&#039;s watch them try. 
 
Info Wars ! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding of the &quot;popularity&quot; of HR-1207 with so many Congressmen, is the little known fact that it is so limited in what it asks.  This bill does not ask for Federal Reserve foreign investment/transaction  audits, &amp; it does not ask for the revelation of the true owners of the FR &amp; how they personally benefit from it.  </p>
<p>In short, HR-1207 falls short of revealing what would be considered important public information. </p>
<p>Will the off shore (Rothschild) control over America&#039;s currency be exposed in the debate itself? </p>
<p>Let&#039;s hope so ! </p>
<p> Will the audit itself, expose the Federal Reserve&#039;s questionable investments in the futures trading market? </p>
<p>It better ! </p>
<p>Ron Paul has created a magnificent Trojan Horse bill, that has the public&#039;s attention &amp; is nearing majority Congressional support. The MSM will have a great deal of trouble lowering the profile on this one, once the debate begins, let&#039;s watch them try. </p>
<p>Info Wars !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Wise</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/06/05/quick-hits-waterboarding-hr1207-a-new-liberty-candidate-rand-bombs-and-random-thoughts/5999/comment-page-1/#comment-3262</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 00:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5999#comment-3262</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry about the waterboarded versions. HR-1207 seems to be exceptionally popular. When the 9/11 GI Bill was going through, remember McCain pushing a watered down version to try to trump it. McCain failed and the original 9/11 GI Bill is about to go into effect.  
 
 I can&#039;t see how HR-1207 could lose in congress. What is the average number of cosponsors a successful bill receives anyway? It seems almost surreal that so many have already signed on and it hasn&#039;t even gone to subcommittee. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#039;t worry about the waterboarded versions. HR-1207 seems to be exceptionally popular. When the 9/11 GI Bill was going through, remember McCain pushing a watered down version to try to trump it. McCain failed and the original 9/11 GI Bill is about to go into effect.  </p>
<p> I can&#039;t see how HR-1207 could lose in congress. What is the average number of cosponsors a successful bill receives anyway? It seems almost surreal that so many have already signed on and it hasn&#039;t even gone to subcommittee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

