Will U.S. Gun Rights Go the Way of England’s?
June 3rd, 2009 3:47 pm | by Mike Miller | Published in Big Government, Civil Liberties, Constitution, Court Cases, Gun Control, Liberty, Obama, Politics, law, states rights | 3 Responses
Based on then-Senator Obama’s voting record regarding gun rights, our current president could arguably be considered the most anti-gun president in our nation’s history. That, along with an anti-gun Congress, the United States could be headed for more tyranny.
As Scott McPherson of The Future of Freedom Foundation pointed out, similar to the right expressed in our Second Amendment, the English have a right to bear arms as expressed in English Declaration of Rights (1688). Nonetheless, in 1997, handgun ownership was completely banned.
Given the leftist atmosphere in U.S. politics currently, alongside the wiggle room that Justice Scalia left in the Heller decision (”Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.”), we could be in trouble. As McPherson puts it,
Don’t bet your life, or your children’s or grandchildren’s freedom, that 50 or a 100 years from now a sufficiently reconstituted and “progressive” Court won’t consider it a “reasonable restriction” of your “not unlimited” right to make firearms so difficult to obtain that armed self-defense becomes a thing of the past.
Government will become more arbitrary, restrained only by good sense and decency — virtues not commonly found in those holding great power. At that point, the American citizen becomes a subject — one step removed from a serf — then a slave. Whatever verbal calisthenics or contortions legislators or judges may employ to convince you otherwise, that was the greatest fear of the Founding Fathers, and the very reason early American statesmen demanded that the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed” — period, end of discussion.
McPherson also explains our natural right to gun ownership in a way I’d not heard it before: we don’t need the 2nd Amendment to deem all federal gun restrictions illegal.
Freedom of speech, of the press, of the right to peacefully assemble, to petition for redress of grievances, to trial by jury, and to be secure from unreasonable search and seizure, and even a statement protecting rights not listed — all are found in the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights. Even if there were no Second Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms would fall under the Ninth Amendment’s protection of unenumerated rights, but gun ownership was considered so important that it too was mentioned specifically.
Liberty Maven










June 4th, 2009 at 12:20 pm (#)
The government won't take my guns in my lifetime; what they do with them after the firefight won't matter to me.
June 4th, 2009 at 6:56 pm (#)
I must say, America as we knew it is history.
Once they were successful in effectively kicking God out of our country, the country is now open for tyrannical rule.
The rich and powerful are in power in America now and they require those who are under their rule to comply with their every whim. This cannot be accomplished if the subject own firearms and weapons.
You will see the citizens of America disarmed. Many will hide their arms, but for the most part, you will see the day when Americans are disarmed.
You never thought God would be kicked out of America?
You would have never dreamed in America, a Christian Nation Homosexuals would be getting married.
You never dreamed of a country where all manner of filth, violence and sex is brought into every room of the houses of the citizens of America via television and internet?
Many will fight, but in the end, the rich and powerful will rule in this corrupt and godless nation of America.
http://www.alaskalive.net
June 5th, 2009 at 3:49 am (#)
Gun rights in the USA will not go the way of gun rights in England.
England has no written constitution.