<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ron Paul talks with Alan Colmes on secession, piracy, torture memos and more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/</link>
	<description>For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 08:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-3694</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 02:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-3694</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s weird how shallow -- or maybe it&#039;s just dumb -- Alan Colmes is. He shows an inability to hear a statement in the context of the particular argument. His arguments are one misinterpretation after another, and he no use for facts since his arguments are emotion-based and unsupported assertions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s weird how shallow &#8212; or maybe it&#039;s just dumb &#8212; Alan Colmes is. He shows an inability to hear a statement in the context of the particular argument. His arguments are one misinterpretation after another, and he no use for facts since his arguments are emotion-based and unsupported assertions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcg</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2879</link>
		<dc:creator>marcg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2879</guid>
		<description> 
Thank you... you hit my exact meaning.... 
 
It&#039;s not playing politics like most play politics these days (changing positions), but rather emphasizing the portions of his beliefs that will resonate with his audience the most. 
 
Enjoy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you&#8230; you hit my exact meaning&#8230;. </p>
<p>It&#039;s not playing politics like most play politics these days (changing positions), but rather emphasizing the portions of his beliefs that will resonate with his audience the most. </p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2854</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2854</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say that a typical politician might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  One thing I&#039;ve seen him do often is leverage issues against each other to reveal inconsistencies.  Framing the conversation is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.          
          
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say that a typical politician might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  One thing I&#039;ve seen him do often is leverage issues against each other to reveal inconsistencies.  Framing the conversation is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.          </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2853</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2853</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  One thing I&#039;ve seen him do often is leverage issues against each other to reveal inconsistencies.  Framing the conversation is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.         
         
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  One thing I&#039;ve seen him do often is leverage issues against each other to reveal inconsistencies.  Framing the conversation is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.         </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  One thing I&#039;ve seen him do often is leverage issues against each other to reveal inconsistencies.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.        
        
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  One thing I&#039;ve seen him do often is leverage issues against each other to reveal inconsistencies.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.        </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2850</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2850</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.       
       
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can appeal to their bias on a given issue and be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.       </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2851</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.      
      
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, avoiding a stance, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.      </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2849</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, strattling the fence, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.     
     
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, strattling the fence, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.     </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2848</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, strattling the fence, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.    
    
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, strattling the fence, dodging questions, tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.    </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2847</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2847</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, playing the fence, and tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.   
   
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, playing the fence, and tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.   </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2846</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2846</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, outright lying, and tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.  
  
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics (misleading, outright lying, and tit-for-tat, etc), but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him.  </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollering</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2009/04/22/ron-paul-talks-with-alan-colmes-on-secession-piracy-torture-memos-and-more/5410/comment-page-1/#comment-2845</link>
		<dc:creator>hollering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=5410#comment-2845</guid>
		<description>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics, but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him. 
 
Great observation and commentary in my opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the framing point is valid.  It&#039;s not playing politics in the same sense as you would say someone like Barack Obama or John McCain might play politics, but in framing the conversation for certain audiences, you can be more effective in communicating an entire framework of thinking.  This is what Ron Paul does so well, and the rest of the libertarian world could learn a lot from him. </p>
<p>Great observation and commentary in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

