Ron Paul on Mancow and the return of pig lipstick
March 24th, 2009 11:54 am | by Marc Gallagher | Published in Activism, Big Government, Commentary, Economics, Federal Reserve, Free Market, government spending, Maven Commentary, Politics, Ron Paul, Taxes | 2 Responses
Ron Paul was interviewed by Mancow on his radio show this morning. Mancow attempted to smack Ron Paul up a bit over his earmark position, but came away satisfied with Paul’s response. They also delved into Paul’s “Federal Reserve Transparency” act HR1207.
Speaking of HR1207, I’ve finally called and emailed my Congressman requesting he support and co-sponsor the bill. For now, I feel satisfied. But I won’t be completely satisfied until he does in fact co-sponsor it and the bill is brought to a vote and passes. Whatever happened to the transparency that was promised during the TARP debate? What happened to the transparency promised by Obama during his campaign? The more things change, the more they stay the same.
There was much talk during the 2008 general election about Sarah Palin and “lipstick on a pig”. The analogy is quite appropriate now for just about every communication we reserve from the Obama administration these days. The administration is essentially an advertising PR team attempting to reframe ruinous policies with flowery words. Being fair, the Bush administration was no better, but Bush wasn’t the “change” candidate.
Let’s not call them “toxic” assets, let’s use the term “legacy”. Let’s not call them combat troops, let’s call them support personnel. Removing the sunshine and lollipops virtual reality goggles reveals an unchanged landscape.
Of course when it comes to labels for those who disagree with the administration the flowery words cease. Let’s not call them Ron Paul supporters, let’s call them domestic terrorists. Whether it’s putting lipstick on a pig or slinging mud it all ends up in the same old place–partisan politics as usual.
Sorry for the somewhat unrelated rant. Listen to the Ron Paul on Mancow interview below.
Liberty Maven





March 24th, 2009 at 5:16 pm (#)
Mancow, like the rest of the bamboozled, have swallowed the propaganda about earmarks. Ron Paul votes against the spending bills. But when one has passed, it allocates funds. The next step is to determine how the funds will be spent. Before government bloated to thousands of times its Constitutional size, every dollar of approved funds was "earmarked" which merely means "specified" as to exactly what they are to be spent on. When government grew to beyond its intended size, this became impossible so the majority of the task was handed off to non-elected bureaucrats. For Paul to push for earmarks for his district is to merely try to get some of that money back to those who paid the taxes in the first place. To ridicule him for that is to demonstrate extreme ignorance.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:42 pm (#)
[...] Ron Paul on Mancow and the return of pig lipstick [...]