Comments on: Ron Paul Agitates James Baker during War Powers Hearing

By: marcg

marcg — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:08:18 +0000

I don't remember Baker being anything…. I just recall hearing his name during the Reagan years (and maybe the daddy Bush years).

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:24:29 +0000

James Baker – “…and you’re not gonna be able to do anything about it”.

I have a great deal of respect for Baker but if something is unconstitutional then not only can congress do something about but they should ! Namely, assert their constitutional authority.

Rather arrogant comment by JB, but given the dislike of Paul that the mainstream Texas GOP has for him it is not surprising.

By: Guest22

Guest22 — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:31:51 +0000

Baker’s closing statement is so bizarrely convoluted, only those who are so accustomed to hearing stentorian statesmen deliver their utterances would nod in agreement with him, even while forcing back their own subconcious cognition that “huh, that just didn’t make any sense”, … their learned Bobble-Head behavior quickly shrugs off such annoying doubt.

By: Guest22

Guest22 — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:18:44 +0000

Agreed.
Baker’s final statement is so bizarrely convoluted, only those who are so accustomed to hearing stentorian statesmen deliver their utterances would nod in agreement with him, forcing back their own subconcious cognition that “huh, that just didn’t make any sense”, … their learned Bobble-Head behavior quickly shrugging off such nagging thoughts.

By: Guest22

Guest22 — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:03:22 +0000

What do you mean, “some credentials” ?
Does he need a special hall-pass to write ??
If, instead, it was actually *YOU* who miswrote, and instead meant to say that you’d like to see a *source* for his statement, then don’t be dense, and write what you mean, ok ?

His (‘fazsha’s) source is very easily discovered:

MANY Reagan presidential historians have cited this fact, among others is the prestigious Mises Institute (U.S. home of the Austrian school of economic theory, and publisher of many books on that topic, as well as host to many economic research fellowships)

In fact, it is they who follow up on Beryl, & Baker – in that Beryl later ‘recanted’ in order to be allowed back in to a senior Whitehouse position & agreed to work w/Baker. (on the “normal” way of doing things: i.e., fraudulent manipulation of the american dollar for narrow global interests)

I remember Baker being a shill back then, and he hasn’t lost his touch.

By: Red Leader

Red Leader — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 09:49:04 +0000

Baker is as wrong as he can possibly be. If he’s talking about national security why didn’t mention pulling out military presence from the middle east since all that does is help islamic fascists with their recruitment numbers? Ron Paul is dead on.Baker has no idea what he’s talking about.

By: utube ghost

utube ghost — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 02:05:54 +0000

That video was taken off quickly wonder why?

By: Guest

Guest — Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:15:32 +0000

Just wondering, but do you have sources for what you say? Not that I don’t believe you, just like to see some credentials.

By: Mike Miller

Mike Miller — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:07:36 +0000

Baker…typical neocon.