i put elected in ( ) because it is well known the current government was not elected,,,,

the real elected government i dont believe would have had these woes,,, but,,, that will remain an unknown,,,

the same as the us,,,, a dissagreement between the people and the elected government,,, i believe ears was in fact honestly elected,,, altho it has yet to be proven to me or anyone else he is a us citizen and elgible for the job…

i have long said not to legalize drugs,,, drugs serve no useful purpose,,, it is also not necessary to have them illegal,,,

drugs are cheap,,, poor farmers grow them and,,, their profit isnt that much i wouldnt imagine,,,, the profit comes from the illegalities and the middle men.

drugs should be passed out free of charge to anyone in the us needing them,,, in other words,,, drug addicts,,,

this would first of all virtually stop all crime such as burglary, robbery,,, etc to sustain a drug habit,,,

it would eliminate all profits from drug dealers,,, dwindling their numbers to zip,,,,

eventually,,, probably a couple of years,,, the locations to pass out the free drugs could begin to close,,,

no drug addict wants to be a drug addict,,,, the word addict is self explanitory,,,,

i myself am a nicotine addict,,, which of course is not illegal,,, but highly taxed,,,

i however live in mexico and buy my drug at tax free stores on the us side of the border,,, so,,, hahahahaha the us govt does not gain from my addiction,,,

did you know the us government purchases more raw tobacco product than any manufacturer? this is to insure a tax revenue in case of a farm shortage,,, it is sold at a loss,,, and why not?? the tax revenues are far more than the actual sales,,,

as long as mexican and us governments can swap money back and forth across the river,,, they will never agree to back down,,,

money talks,,, and there is just as much money in combating drugs as selling drugs,,,

everyone is happy with the status quo.