<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Ron Paul in 2012 Talk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertymaven.com/2008/12/26/more-ron-paul-in-2012-talk/3803/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertymaven.com/2008/12/26/more-ron-paul-in-2012-talk/3803/</link>
	<description>For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:51:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: libertyforone</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2008/12/26/more-ron-paul-in-2012-talk/3803/comment-page-1/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>libertyforone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 08:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=3803#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>Nice sentiment, but do you realize how old the man is right now?  We need a new man to rally behind.  Lew Rockwell or Jacob Hornberger or someone I have never heard of yet.  We have four years to get it together.  

I have one problem with your article, you don&#039;t seem to understand Austrian Economics.  You write:  &quot;Eventually, as this continues, our own dollars will be watered down and diluted.&quot;  There is no eventually about it.  Every dollar printed, created electronically, or however they &quot;make&quot; it, dilutes our currency.  Every single dollar.  The only question is a matter of how much, not when.  

Moreover, this is not ironic at all.  The very creation of the Fed was so that politicians could rob us blind without raising taxes.  They do it on purpose.  They LIE to us in those speeches when they say they won&#039;t raise taxes.  They know what they are doing.  It is not by mistake that they promise one thing but do another.  

Obama is the same.  The headlines are hysterical.  In one fell swoop it says that Obama will be keeping his campaign promises of lowering the taxes on the middle class while at the same time they talk of him creating a &quot;stimulus&quot; package of stealing 800 billion from all us middle classers so that he can give some of that back to us.  Does anyone read what they themselves write?  Do they not realize that how incredibly backwards they are?  

Ron Paul is a good man.  But he made a lousy candidate.  He never wanted to win, he wanted to make a statement.  He did that.  His campaign was run by children, on purpose, so that he wouldn&#039;t win.  I know, I have heard them confess.  I only wish he had told all of us because I spent more money than I could afford to get him elected.  I also wish he had spent all of the money on the Presidential campaign.  Ah well...

What we need now is education.  Even the people writing for the cause don&#039;t truly understand it.  Now is the time for all of us to read Man, Economy and State and Human Action.  We have time.  Ron Paul has read them both.  If we don&#039;t then how can have any idea what he is talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice sentiment, but do you realize how old the man is right now?  We need a new man to rally behind.  Lew Rockwell or Jacob Hornberger or someone I have never heard of yet.  We have four years to get it together.  </p>
<p>I have one problem with your article, you don&#8217;t seem to understand Austrian Economics.  You write:  &#8220;Eventually, as this continues, our own dollars will be watered down and diluted.&#8221;  There is no eventually about it.  Every dollar printed, created electronically, or however they &#8220;make&#8221; it, dilutes our currency.  Every single dollar.  The only question is a matter of how much, not when.  </p>
<p>Moreover, this is not ironic at all.  The very creation of the Fed was so that politicians could rob us blind without raising taxes.  They do it on purpose.  They LIE to us in those speeches when they say they won&#8217;t raise taxes.  They know what they are doing.  It is not by mistake that they promise one thing but do another.  </p>
<p>Obama is the same.  The headlines are hysterical.  In one fell swoop it says that Obama will be keeping his campaign promises of lowering the taxes on the middle class while at the same time they talk of him creating a &#8220;stimulus&#8221; package of stealing 800 billion from all us middle classers so that he can give some of that back to us.  Does anyone read what they themselves write?  Do they not realize that how incredibly backwards they are?  </p>
<p>Ron Paul is a good man.  But he made a lousy candidate.  He never wanted to win, he wanted to make a statement.  He did that.  His campaign was run by children, on purpose, so that he wouldn&#8217;t win.  I know, I have heard them confess.  I only wish he had told all of us because I spent more money than I could afford to get him elected.  I also wish he had spent all of the money on the Presidential campaign.  Ah well&#8230;</p>
<p>What we need now is education.  Even the people writing for the cause don&#8217;t truly understand it.  Now is the time for all of us to read Man, Economy and State and Human Action.  We have time.  Ron Paul has read them both.  If we don&#8217;t then how can have any idea what he is talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOUNGE DADDY &#187; More Ron Paul in 2012?</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2008/12/26/more-ron-paul-in-2012-talk/3803/comment-page-1/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>LOUNGE DADDY &#187; More Ron Paul in 2012?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 22:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libertymaven.com/?p=3803#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>[...] do better in 2012 than he did in 2008. He has plenty of &#8220;see I told you so&#8221; behind him. As Liberty Maven posted, &#8220;the state of the economy by 2012 may play right into Ron Paul’s chances of winning the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do better in 2012 than he did in 2008. He has plenty of &#8220;see I told you so&#8221; behind him. As Liberty Maven posted, &#8220;the state of the economy by 2012 may play right into Ron Paul’s chances of winning the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
