Will Joey Biden Be President? The Barack Obama Birth Saga Continues…

December 7th, 2008 6:07 pm  |  by  |  Published in Big Government, Commentary, Constitution, Court Cases, Election, Liberty, Obama, rule of law  |  8 Responses

When I first started writing on the constitutional eligibility of both Barack Obama and John McCain after the conventions, I thought the issue would be quickly silenced.  Forgive my chuckling and a cheer as the forces of the Constitution continue their valiant charge for that “damn piece of paper.”

by Jake, the Champion of the Constitution
Originally published December 7, 2008 at http://www.nolanchart.com/article5606.html

obamaWASHINGTON, DC, DECEMBER 8 – All eyes from the Democratic National Party, and many others from around the nation focused for a moment on the Supreme Court, which has just decided that they would not hear the lawsuit Donofrio vs. Wells, which alleges Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be president per the Washington Post.   A request had been made to postpone the Electoral College vote set for December 15 so that the case could have been heard.

[12/09/08 RETRACTION:  Previously, this article claimed that attorney Leo Donofrio of New Jersey would appear at the WTP press conference as per their WTP website and letter below.  Mr. Donofrio replied writing, "Please correct your story. I am Leo Donofrio and I have nothing to do with the National Press Club event tomorrow. Nobody will represent my case there, and I am not involved with the others who have brought suits."  It appears his name was used by the WTP without his permission.  His website is here, although I profess I cannot check it from where I live in China due to firewall issues.  My humblest apologies to Mr. Donofrio and all. ]

A group known as the We The People Foundation held a separate press conference this afternoon, and may have had another two attorneys present (Attorneys Philip Berg (PA) and Orly Taitz (CA)) to issue statements summarizing their arguments and path forward.  There are at least 10 other lawsuits in various stages filed in other states.  WTP issued their statement today, outlining their next steps.  (Photo link)

WTP paid for a scathing full-page open letter ad that ran in Obama’s hometown newspaper, the Chicago Tribune, on two days last week. WTP has sent five (5) public open letters in November to President-elect Obama requesting he immediately release his birth certificate for examination by a team of forensic experts. At the top of the WTP website is a great shot contrasting his “birth certificate” with his “birth certification.”

The Washington Times published an article December 5 titled “An Imposter in the White House?“, complete with a shifty-looking picture of Obama.

The troublesome text from Section 1 of the Constitution is:

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

I enjoyed reading WTP’s letter (sorry, cackling in glee is in truth more apt), and have made the point in this column previously that if Obama does not address this, he will consistently be labeled an usurper for his entire reign, a la Bush-Gore 2000, only much worse since he is clearly at fault.  Here it is in full:

__________________________________________________________________________

Dear Mr. Obama:

Representing thousands of responsible American citizens who have also taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America, I am duty bound to call on you to remedy an apparent violation of the Constitution.

Compelling evidence supports the claim that you are barred from holding the Office of President by the “natural born citizen” clause of the U.S. Constitution. For instance:

  • You have posted on the Internet an unsigned, forged and thoroughly discredited, computer-generated birth form created in 2007, a form that lacks vital information found on any original, hand signed Certificate of Live Birth, such as hospital address, signature of attending physician and age of mother.
  • Hawaii Dept of Health will not confirm your assertion that you were born in Hawaii.
  • Legal affidavits state you were born in Kenya.
  • Your grandmother is recorded on tape saying she attended your birth in Kenya.
  • U.S. Law in effect in 1961 denied U.S. citizenship to any child born in Kenya if the father was Kenyan and the mother was not yet 19 years of age.
  • In 1965, your mother legally relinquished whatever Kenyan or U.S. citizenship she and you had by marrying an Indonesian and becoming a naturalized Indonesian citizen.

obYou have repeatedly refused to provide evidence of your eligibility when challenged to do so in a number of recent lawsuits. Instead, you have been successful in having judges declare that they are powerless to order you to prove your eligibility to assume the Office of President.  (Obama photo from bbsrock license source)

Incredibly, the judge in Hawaii actually said it would be an invasion of your privacy for him to order access to your original birth certificate in order to prove your eligibility to hold the Office of President.

Before you can legitimately exercise any of the powers of the President you must meet all the criteria for eligibility established by the Constitution. You are under a moral, legal, and fiduciary duty to proffer such evidence. Should you assume the office as anyone but a bona fide natural born citizen of the United States who has not relinquished that citizenship, you would be inviting a national crisis that would undermine the domestic peace and stability of the Nation. For example:

  • You would always be viewed by many Americans as a poseur – a usurper.
  • As a usurper, you would be unable to take the required “Oath or Affirmation” on January 20 without committing the crime of perjury or false swearing, for being ineligible you cannot faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States.
  • You would be entitled to no allegiance, obedience or support from the People.
  • The Armed Forces would be under no legal obligation to remain obedient to you.
  • No civilian in the Executive Branch would be required to obey any of your proclamations, Executive Orders or directives, as such orders would be legally void.
  • Your appointments of Judges to the Supreme Court would be void.
  • Congress would not be able to pass any needed legislation because it would not be able to acquire the signature of a bona fide President.
  • Congress would be unable to remove you, a usurper, from the Office of the President on Impeachment, inviting certain political chaos including a potential for armed conflicts within the General Government or among the States and the People to effect the removal of such a usurper.

In consideration of the escalating constitutional crisis brought on by the total lack of evidence needed to conclusively establish your eligibility, I am compelled to serve you with this First Amendment Petition for a Redress of this violation of the Constitution.

With all due respect, I ask that you immediately direct the appropriate Hawaiian officials to allow access to the vault copy of your birth certificate by our forensic scientists on Friday, Saturday and Sunday, December 5, 6 and 7, 2008.

In addition, I ask that you deliver the following documentary evidence to the National Press Club in Washington DC by 10 am on December 8, 2008, marked for my attention:

  • A certified copy of your original, signed “vault” birth certificate.
  • Certified copies of your reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham.
  • A certified copy of your Certification of Citizenship.
  • A certified copy of your Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity.
  • Certified copies of your admission forms for Occidental College,
  • Columbia University and Harvard Law School.
  • Certified copies of any legal documents changing your name.

Each member of the Electoral College, who is committed to casting a vote on December 15, 2008, has a constitutional duty to make certain you are a natural-born citizen. As of today, there is no evidence in the public record (nor have you provided any) that defeats the claim that you are barred by law from assuming the Office of President because you fail the Constitution’s eligibility requirements.

All state Electors are now on Notice that unless you provide documentary evidence before December 15, that conclusively establishes your eligibility, they cannot cast a vote for you without committing treason to the Constitution.

In a government of laws, the existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy.” Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438

Thank you for your understanding and cooperation in this urgent matter.

__________________________________________________________________________

FreeRepublic.com has call-in numbers for all of Hawaii’s hospitals, and claims to have called each one and been told by each that Obama was not born there, nor did his mother ever visit. Now, I am certainly not a “right-winger,” and Philip Berg, the attorney that started this whole circus, is a politically-active Democrat (until he started this lawsuit, that is!). I would still raise these questions even if it was an individual I liked, but geez, tonight I may have to laugh myself to sleep.

Back to my bold title, which I thought about in September but did not wish to publish since it seemed so far-fetched at the time. If Obama is ruled constitutionally ineligible, it does seems likely Joey Biden will be selected by the Electoral College. Perhaps Obama would be eligible to be his VP. This would be an utter irony since Joey was destroyed early in the Democratic primaries by the lawyers three – Obama, Clinton, and Edwards.

In conclusion, Obama certainly appears as if he is hiding the truth from us; he is on trial for no crime, but to prove his qualification to be President, which is the responsibility of each individual aspiring to this office. His lack of cooperation proves this man will treat the Constitution with the same disrespect as Bush.  When Obama opens his mouth to start stating the oath without proving he is eligible, he will be a fraud for the rest of his life in my eyes, edging out George W. Bush for the new all-time record.

For more depth on this issue, I recommend reading my last update “Can Barack Obama Be President? – THE SAGA CONTINUES! (10/29 Update)“.

In memory of the deaths on Pearl Harbor Day, the start of the last American war that was legal and just per the Constitution. What an interesting “damn piece of paper”!

Jake, the Champion of the Constitution

www.CampaignForLiberty.com [Reach the Author Here!]

___________________________________________________________________________

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

As always, unlike the NFL, the author grants full permission to allow any accounts of, rebroadcasts, retransmissions, repostings in part or full of this article to your blog or anywhere else in order to promote the Restoration of our Republic.

Veritas numquam perit. Veritas odit moras. Veritas vincit. Truth never perishes. Truth hates delay. Truth conquers.

___________________________________________________________________________

Nolan Chart Facebook Group Page Created

Summary of Articles for Jake, the Champion of the Constitution (12/03/2008)

___________________________________________________________________________

The “Deep Fry The Barackcuda” Series

  1. Barack Obama – America’s Half-Blood Prince
  2. Can Barack Obama Be President? – THE SAGA CONTINUES! (10/29 Update)
  3. Is Barack Obama “The One”?
  4. THE SAGA CONTINUES – John McCain and Barack Obama – Can They Even BE President?
  5. A Speech Barack Obama Could Give to Win the Presidency, Ron Paul, and Carroll Quigley’s “Tragedy and Hope”
  6. John McCain and Barack Obama – Can They Even BE President?
  7. Utter Chaos in Afghanistan and Pakistan as Barack Obama Sanctions Preemptive War
  8. US Military Draft Creeps Closer – Ron Paul and I Defy Senators “Barackcuda” Obama and “Just-Bomb-It” McCain

___________________________________________________________________________

Other Recent Articles by the Author

On Gold and Market Manipulation
Published: December 8, 2008
“Gold is Money, and Nothing Else.” – JP Morgan before Congress’s Pujo Commission, 1913

The Next Bubble to Pop!
Published: December 7, 2008
“These days, I am more concerned with the return OF my capital, not the return ON my capital.” – attributed to Mark Twain

The End for the Dollar and all Fiat Currencies – A Money Matrix Addendum
Published: December 6, 2008
Gold is now in backwardation. I submit to you, Reader, the US Dollar is now officially a DEAD MAN WALKING.

Ron Paul Is Wrong – George W. Bush Must Be Tried for MURDER!
Published: December 6, 2008
As much as I admire his ideas, sometimes Ron Paul disappoints me.

SPOOF: New Element Discovered in America!
Published: December 5, 2008
The heaviest element ever was discovered yesterday by Franklin Delano Mussolini Laboratories of Washington, DC. Read all about it!

Words of Advice for the next Secretary of State
Published: December 3, 2008
President-elect Barack Obama recently announced his pick for SecState: Senator Hillary Clinton. Here is some advice for her, from a former Secretary of State by the name of John Quincy Adams.

Ron Paul Wastes Chance to Deliver KO Punch to FED
Published: November 20, 2008
Ron Paul failed to wipe the floor with Bernanke in the last Congressional Hearing. Here’s why. Shift tactics next time!

The Money Matrix – How the FED Works (PART 6/15)
Published: November 17, 2008
A step-by-step explanation of how the Federal Reserve, America’s Central Bank, can manipulate monetary policy.

Responses

  1. RBurnett says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 3:17 am (#)

    Over at WorldNetDaily, they are passing around a petition to make the Court or whomever look into the issue of Obama’s birth.
    They ask if the Supreme Court will take up the case.
    The answer to this is No.
    The news that the Court hasn’t taken the case will go unnoticed by the media.
    Further, this will finish off any hope that the Electoral College will not ratify Obama as the next President. And after the College does its work, then you will all have to find something else–Impeachment, anyone?

  2. Jake4Constitution says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 3:55 am (#)

    Obama will likely be the next POTUS, I agree in that respect. Too much money has been spent, and nothing can go wrong now!

    Impeachment? Bush first! there is still 5 weeks left, but if a court doesnt rule Obama eligible, I will take it shaken, not stirred.

  3. Jake4Constitution says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 4:40 am (#)

    sent to me by a reader via email

    ” 1. According to the Hawaii law as I have read several times on internet> It states the “vault copy” of a birth certificate can only be given to the owner, a relative (with power of attorney) —-OR —- a person with an “intense need”, such as a COURT JUDGE.

    2. Therefore, please search and re-publish this law, many times. Also ask EACH READER to contact a friend who is a COURT JUDGE (especially a Federal Court Judge) asking him (or her) to send an e-mail or
    FAX TODAY to person in charge in Hawaii (of birth certificates, or to the Governor) INSISTING that IAW section XYZ of Hawaii constitution/law, that a “certified copy of OB’s ORIGINAL vault copy of OB’s birth certificate” be sent to the designated JUDGE; and (2) send the same via OVER NIGHT MAIL with letter which can be legally proven by Hawaii authorities, hospital records, and submitted into court.

    3. Print it every day or two. Then if a satisfactory response is NOT given, then have various JUDGES in USA sue Governor of Hawaii.

    This OUGHT to get things hopping right away.”

  4. Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » The Sad Decline Of The r3volution says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 8:26 am (#)

    [...] Perhaps it’s too be expected, but it appears that some of Ron Paul’s supporters have descended into the depths of Obama Derangement Syndrome. [...]

  5. RBurnett says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 9:32 am (#)

    Today, Dec. 8, for you all, a day that will live in infamy, the Court has decided not to hear the several cases having to do with Obama's birth and related matters.

    So, you have lost–like this was unexpected?

    Now you might declate a sort of war against the Court, as that reader indicates (having readers contact judges and read them the law) but there's always two problems with speaking truth to power–1. That truth isn't always on your side and 2. that power can and does tell truth exactly where to go, and has the means to make this so.

    As to the joke of mine about impeachment–well, there's been all too much of this. A serious campaign for impeachment has no chance as now it seems that any President, even those dead, are now on someone's impeachment list. In a word, the talk of impeachment, as we now know it, has made frivolouis any attempts to impeach. Rousseau made the comment that there are at least two kinds of guard dogs of the city–those animals that yap incessantly and cannot discern which threat was real, and those other guards who only bark at the real dangers–

    You all have barked once too often and now, even if there was any substance to the Obama birth issue, no one is listening.

  6. Jake4Constitution says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 3:34 pm (#)

    RBurnett – thanks for writing back, I sincerely always enjoy your responses.

    “So, you have lost–like this was unexpected?”

    you are defining “winning” far, far more differently than I am.

    I never expected this issue to drag on for so long and take on, well, circus-type qualities.

    “You all have barked once too often and now, even if there was any substance to the Obama birth issue, no one is listening.”

    Sounds like you must really hate Barry Goldwater’s quote
    “Extremism in the name of liberty is no vice”

  7. RBurnett says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 7:05 pm (#)

    This issue, that of Obama’s birth, hasn’t dragged on very long at all. Indeed, no one was listening or taking any of this stuff about Obama’s birth seriously. That it is usual for lawsuits filed to take time to be officially acknowledged or swept away doesn’t mean that the issue has gained any traction.
    And if winning means to have an issue such as this drag on for some time, then many defeats can also be called victories–at this point we are merely trying to define the words–follow:
    And no, I do not hate the quote of Goldwater’s especially since the neoconservative and arch enemy of Dilorenzo ( a Liberty Maven Liberty hero) Harry Jaffa (one of Leo Strauss’ leading disciples) wrote this line in Goldwater’s speech, if not also the whole speech itself.
    Andd here we must define liberty and extremism–Jaffa’s definition of liberty is not yours, to say the least.
    It never fails to amuse me how you people can quote this line from Goldwater’s speech without knowing where it came from and who wrote it–there’s a dysfuntion there somewhere in your appreciation of political philosophy.
    But then< I have found that too many libertarian bloggers have accepted at face value the evaluation of Jaffa and Strauss by others, namely their critics, without ever having read a line of The Crisis of the House Divided or Natural Right and History. It seems that the opinion of Rothbard, Rockwell and Dilorenzo are athoritative for libertarians–a nice irony as are not libertarians supposed to be able to think independently and be able to evaluate the source material on their own without the need for some libertarian commentary?
    And one last note: You have missed the point of the barking guard dogs–one can be extreme without the need for repetition. One large bark can be much more extreme than any series of smaller barkings, especially if these smaller barkings are unnoticed–as yours are regarding the Obama birth issue. Do not mistake these blogs of yours or WorldNetDaily as having any kind of an audience like, say, NBC or CBS or ABC, which have not mentioned this Obama birth issue at all. If one of these big media outfits did make a mention, that would be the big bark.
    And extremeism has got really nothing to do with such warnings–there are those at the radio show Coast to Coast who do look extreme, extreme because, well, they are just plain nuts–unless you also have bought into the Mayan calendar, the crop circles, numerology and the rest of the stuff.

  8. Jake4Constitution says:

    December 8th, 2008 at 7:26 pm (#)

    you are still defining “winning” far, far more differently than I am.

    thanks, I never heard of Jaffa before, will take a look. i understand the significance of context, but words will always mean whatever the listener takes them to mean.

    i get your meaning on the barking, but I think the only chance for this stuff to go mainstream is if the # of lawsuits grows to triple digits or something unexpected occurs, like Brad Pitt taking this on as a pet issue. even then it would probably be looked upon as something comical.

    no mayan doom or crop circles for me, slightly partial to global cooling theory though. :) thank you very much for commenting!

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.