Mock the Vote

November 3rd, 2008 11:57 am  |  by Mike Miller  |  Published in Bailouts, Banking, Big Government, Civil Liberties, Constitution, Debt, Economics, Election, Federal Reserve, Free Market, Liberty, Money, Politics, Taxes, ballot access, congress, ludwig von mises, national debt  |  2 Responses

Today’s article at the Ludwig von Mises Institute describes the farce that is our political system these days, building on quotes from Jesse Ventura, Walter E. Williams, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Philip Jackson, Murray Rothbard, and James Bovard:

Jesse Ventura, when he’s not talking about 9-11, makes a lot of sense. Describing the two party system to Larry King, he said,

[W]hat you have today is like walking into the grocery store and you go to the soft drink department, and there is only Pepsi and Coke. Those are the two you get to choose from. There is no Mountain Dew, no Root Beer, no Orange. They’re both Colas; one is slightly sweeter than the other, depending on which side of the aisle you are on.

In an interview with Newsmax, he described politicians in the two party system as pro wrestlers.

In pro wrestling, out in front of the people, we make it look like we all hate each other and want to beat the crap out of each other, and that’s how we get your money, [and get you to] come down and buy tickets. They’re the same thing. Out in front of the public and the cameras, they hate each other, are going to beat the crap out of each other, but behind the scenes they’re all going to dinner, cutting deals. And [they're] doing what we did, too — laughing all the way to the bank. And that to me is what you have today, in today’s political world, with these two parties.

Jesse’s right. Our political system is a farce. This year, we have running for president a warmonger who’s a reluctant socialist versus a socialist who’s a reluctant warmonger. We have two parties that claim they’re different, but when the Establishment, the Complex, our shadowy overlords, whatever you want to call them, really want something, they get it. When the Establishment wanted the Bailout in the face of almost universal grassroots opposition, they got it. When the Complex wanted immunity to the telecoms who knowingly spied on Americans, they got it. When our shadowy overlords wanted stormtroopers to brutally stifle protesters during the party conventions, they got it.

But even if voters had a real choice — and even if the politicians followed the majority will on issues that matter — the system would still most likely be a farce. As Augustine observed, without justice, a government is nothing but a band of thieves. Augustine was writing about kingdoms, but his insight applies to democracies as well. Without justice, the ability of the subjects of a government to vote on the laws and rulers that govern them doesn’t make a government any more legitimate than an unjust monarchy. And the founders of this country did not believe democracies were likely to be just.

Continue reading here.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Responses

  1. Slaughter says:

    November 3rd, 2008 at 3:38 pm (#)

    http://www.slaughterhaus.com

  2. TimK says:

    November 3rd, 2008 at 7:50 pm (#)

    Actually, I always thought of the choice as between dog food and cat food. And every 2 years, we vote on the mix of dog food and cat food we all will be consuming, every single day until the next election. And whenever I complain that I don’t want to eat dog food or cat food anymore, that I want to make my world-famous spaghetti with meat sauce, I get sideways looks, as though I were the crazy one.

    -TimK

    (Okay, my spaghetti with meat sauce may not be world famous, but at least it’s a favorite of the family. Hmm. I’m hungry.)

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.