<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Market: Should We Cue The Violins?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://libertymaven.com/2008/06/27/the-market-should-we-cue-the-violins/1221/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://libertymaven.com/2008/06/27/the-market-should-we-cue-the-violins/1221/</link>
	<description>For Liberty, One Individual At A Time</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Market: Should We Cue The Violins?</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2008/06/27/the-market-should-we-cue-the-violins/1221/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>The Market: Should We Cue The Violins?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 05:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/?p=1221#comment-669</guid>
		<description>[...] The Market: Should We Cue The Violins? Yesterday, the Dow Jones Industrial fell over 3 percentage points, a drop of well over 300 points. Sadly, these kinds of swings hurt small investors far more than they do institutional investors; many individuals see the large drop and &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Market: Should We Cue The Violins? Yesterday, the Dow Jones Industrial fell over 3 percentage points, a drop of well over 300 points. Sadly, these kinds of swings hurt small investors far more than they do institutional investors; many individuals see the large drop and &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike montagne</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2008/06/27/the-market-should-we-cue-the-violins/1221/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>mike montagne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/?p=1221#comment-649</guid>
		<description>The whole idea of "securities" is unearned gain. Unearned gain from the pool of wealth can only come at cost to real producers -- it deprives real producers of the very opportunity to receive for their production, an equal measure of the production of others, because unearned taking inserts itself in the chain of potential reward.

This of course is part of what's "driving up" energy and food costs. It's why millions are starving while food waits in storehouses until the starving can meet the price of the commodities trader who produces nothing and takes the vast share of potential reward for wealth.

These things are bad enough on their own, but given an underlying monetary system which itself can only multiply debt while we maintain a vital circulation by re-borrowing interest and principal as ever greater sums of debt, the competitive quest for unearned gain exhausts the last potential reward for real enterprise, even before inherent multiplication of debt by the monetary system imposes inevitable collapse under a terminal sum of debt we can no longer afford to service.

As both are coming to a head now; the smoke and mirror of "long term securities" can only hope to take profit from an unsustainable, bankrupt system.

Which of course is why, advocating these *un-free* markets of predation in the style of Mises and Paul, you can hardly afford a featured link to PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy.

Neither Paul, Vieira, Griffin, Mises, Browne, Hayek, or you advocate solution. And this? Essentially it advocates unearned profit at the expense for instance of multiplying public/federal costs, or the costs of our commerce, where, under mathematically perfected economy, the costs of unearned profit are eliminated, and "the markets" are truly freed, by solution of the devaluation of currency, and multiplication of debt by interest -- something the Austrians actually *advocate* to our perpetual demise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole idea of &#8220;securities&#8221; is unearned gain. Unearned gain from the pool of wealth can only come at cost to real producers &#8212; it deprives real producers of the very opportunity to receive for their production, an equal measure of the production of others, because unearned taking inserts itself in the chain of potential reward.</p>
<p>This of course is part of what&#8217;s &#8220;driving up&#8221; energy and food costs. It&#8217;s why millions are starving while food waits in storehouses until the starving can meet the price of the commodities trader who produces nothing and takes the vast share of potential reward for wealth.</p>
<p>These things are bad enough on their own, but given an underlying monetary system which itself can only multiply debt while we maintain a vital circulation by re-borrowing interest and principal as ever greater sums of debt, the competitive quest for unearned gain exhausts the last potential reward for real enterprise, even before inherent multiplication of debt by the monetary system imposes inevitable collapse under a terminal sum of debt we can no longer afford to service.</p>
<p>As both are coming to a head now; the smoke and mirror of &#8220;long term securities&#8221; can only hope to take profit from an unsustainable, bankrupt system.</p>
<p>Which of course is why, advocating these *un-free* markets of predation in the style of Mises and Paul, you can hardly afford a featured link to PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy.</p>
<p>Neither Paul, Vieira, Griffin, Mises, Browne, Hayek, or you advocate solution. And this? Essentially it advocates unearned profit at the expense for instance of multiplying public/federal costs, or the costs of our commerce, where, under mathematically perfected economy, the costs of unearned profit are eliminated, and &#8220;the markets&#8221; are truly freed, by solution of the devaluation of currency, and multiplication of debt by interest &#8212; something the Austrians actually *advocate* to our perpetual demise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kludge</title>
		<link>http://libertymaven.com/2008/06/27/the-market-should-we-cue-the-violins/1221/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Kludge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.libertymaven.com/?p=1221#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Amazing, amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing, amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
