Collins Bailey Maryland Congressional Candidate Interview Part 1

February 15th, 2008 9:38 pm  |  by Marc Gallagher  |  Published in Collins Bailey Interview  |  1

Collins Bailey For Congress

Collins Bailey just won the Republican Primary for Maryland’s 5th Congressional District on February 12th. He was kind enough to agree to an interview with Liberty Maven. This is part 1 of the interview. For complete Liberty Maven interviews please check out the interview page.

LM: Please give a little bit of information about your background, your principles, and why you decided to run for Congress?

Bailey: [Editor's Note: Bailey answered this question by using the introductory text directly found on his website. I'm reprinting only the first portion of the answer since the rest is available on the Collins Bailey web site: BaileyForUSCongress.com]

Collins Bailey is 54 years old and has been blessed to be married for 33 years. He has four wonderful children by that marriage. In addition to being a self-employed business man for over 30 years, he has spent the last twenty years of his life working to make our schools better for all children.

He is currently serving his fourth consecutive four year term as an elected member of the Charles County Board of Education. That position pays $4,000.00 a year and consumes a great deal of time. The first year he ran for the Board of Education was in 1986. While he has been busy overcoming the challenges in public education to provide greater opportunity for all students and their parents, our leaders in the federal government have increased the national debt ten fold. Because of this out of control spending our dollar has lost 40% of its value in just the last 7 years.

If our children are to have economic and personal liberty and opportunity in the future then we must hold our elected officials accountable when they break the oath of office that they took to “preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.” We must also hold ourselves individually accountable for our own areas of responsibility and being informed. Our American independence, national sovereignty, and economic liberty is under attack from many forces today. But the most dangerous force is our federal leaders that ignore the rule of law and ignore our Constitution….. See BaileyForUSCongress.com for the rest.

LM: In Maryland’s 5th District House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer is your competition. I’m sure you realize he will be extremely difficult to beat in the general election. Without giving away too many secrets, how will you run your campaign in order to make a concerted effort to unseat Hoyer? Will you target moderate Democrats as well as the GOP base?

Bailey: Actually, I had “competition” in the primary. Congressman Hoyer is more of a contrast than competition. In the primary, since Mike Hethmon and I shared philosophical views on the role of the federal government and had (and have) great respect for the Constitution, the voters had to choose who they wanted to carry the message.

In the general election, the choice is entirely different. Instead of persons, personalities and party, the choice should be over rule of law, the direction of our country and governmental philosophy. There may be general agreement, and I suspect there is, about what some of the challenges are for our nation. However, my philosophy and congressman Hoyer’s are quite opposite. It is up to the voters to decide which philosophy of government they want.

  • I believe problems caused by our federal government are not best solved by more government.
  • I believe that individuals can make better choices than a centralized “nanny” state.
  • I believe that Congress no longer represents the American people.
  • I believe that we cannot continue on the path we are on and that change must be mandated at the ballot box.
  • I believe that our personal and economic liberty must be restored. American wages are being eroded by deficit spending. We all see the weaker dollar’s effect when we buy gasoline.
  • I believe that Congresses inaction, or worse still, action that makes our challenges greater, is unacceptable.
  • Congress has driven jobs over seas.
  • Congress has devalued our dollar with deficit spending.
  • Congress has spend every penny of the Social Security Trust Fund and replaced the money that should be in the fund with a 9.2 trillion dollar debt.
  • Congress is running a billion dollar debt per day.
  • Congress has talked about immigration, but not acted. If they do act, can we trust the results? Our borders are still open. We are still paying welfare to illegal aliens thanks to Congressman Hoyers singular action in September of 2007. Illegal aliens can collect Social Security after working in this country for 18 months.
  • Congress has talked about education and they have acted. Their action has increased red tape, increased cost, and made our schools worse.
  • Congress has talked about health care. Their proposals have and will increase cost and ration care.
  • In one appropriation bill there were 9,000 earmarks according to the December 10, 2007 front page article of the Washington Post.’

The list is endless. The answers to these issues are not moderate, conservative or liberal; they are common sense that voters understand.

LM: Many of your positions seem to be in line with Presidential candidate Ron Paul. On what positions do you differ with Ron Paul, if any?

Bailey:

  • I am against earmarks.
  • We must cut spending to balance the budget.
  • After balancing the budget, 1/2 of the savings from eliminating wasteful and unconstitutional spending should be used to pay down the federal debt, and 1/2 of the savings should be given back to the tax payers by cutting taxes.
  • The personal exemption should be raised form $3,300.00 to $15,000.00.
  • Foreign aid abuses must be stopped.
  • Social Security taxes should be kept separate in a real trust fund and spent ONLY on Social Security benefits. Obligations to those already retired must be paid. Benefits should be revenue specific for those that are just starting in the work force and participation should be voluntary.

LM: You have been serving on the Charles County School Board for many years. What are your thoughts on the Federal Department of Education? As recently as 1996 the Republican Platform suggested abolishing this department. Are you in favor of abolishment, expansion, or modification?

Bailey: A centralized, top down, one shoe fits all approach to education does not work. Further more, that approach takes away accountability for where it should be, to the parent. I would put parents, teachers and local education authorities back in control. I would abolish the Department of Education.

LM: Many past and current politicians have discussed instituting term limits for members of Congress. What is your position on Congressional term limits?

Bailey: Our Constitution starts with the words “We the People”. Since the chance of getting politicians to pass laws to limit themselves is very unlikely, voters must do so with the ballot box. I would like to see all retirement benefits eliminated for anyone that is in Congress after January 2009. I think we would quickly see who is there to serve the American people and who is not.

This concludes the first interview segment with Collins Bailey. Keep checking back for future Liberty Maven interview segments.

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Responses

  1. Collins Bailey, Candidate Interview Part 2 :: Liberty Maven says:

    February 18th, 2008 at 10:33 pm (#)

    [...] Continuing our interview with Collins Bailey here is part 2. If you haven’t read part 1 yet, check it out. [...]

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.