SAFE Act Passes in the House. Internet regulation for the masses.

December 7th, 2007 2:01 am  |  by  |  Published in Individual Responsibility, Internet Regulation, Liberty, Philosophy, Politics  |  0

The Securing Adolescents From Exploitation-Online (SAFE) Act would force “anyone with an open Wi-Fi connection to report illegal images–or pay fines of up to $300,000.” The bill passed in the House and is being sent to the Senate for review.

Not one Democrat opposed the SAFE Act. Two Republicans did: Rep. Ron Paul, the libertarian-leaning presidential candidate from Texas, and Rep. Paul Broun from Georgia.

More from the CNET article:

That broad definition would cover individuals, coffee shops, libraries, hotels, and even some government agencies that provide Wi-Fi. It also sweeps in social-networking sites, domain name registrars, Internet service providers, and e-mail service providers such as Hotmail and Gmail, and it may require that the complete contents of the user’s account be retained for subsequent police inspection.

Before the House vote, which was a lopsided 409 to 2, Rep. Nick Lampson (D-Texas) held a press conference on Capitol Hill with John Walsh, the host of America’s Most Wanted and Ernie Allen, head of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Allen said the legislation–called the Securing Adolescents From Exploitation-Online Act, or SAFE Act–will “ensure better reporting, investigation, and prosecution of those who use the Internet to distribute images of illegal child pornography.”

The SAFE Act represents the latest in Congress’ efforts–some of which have raised free speech and privacy concerns–to crack down on sex offenders and Internet predators. One billrequire sex offenders to supply e-mail addresses and instant messaging user names. introduced a year ago was even broader and would have forced Web sites and blogs to report illegal images. Another would

Wednesday’s vote caught Internet companies by surprise: the Democratic leadership rushed the SAFE Act to the floor under a procedure that’s supposed to be reserved for noncontroversial legislation. It was introduced October 10, but has never received even one hearing or committee vote. In addition, the legislation approved this week has changed substantially since the earlier version and was not available for public review.

Here is yet another excuse to take away liberties. The “war on terror” brought us the PATRIOT Act. Now “Protect the children” brings us the SAFE Act. Please, make it stop.

Leave a Response

You must be logged in to post a comment.