Liberty Maven

I’m a believer in freedom because of Harry Browne. Well, perhaps it was just convenience and timing, but I became a lover of liberty in the mid 90’s as a college student. Harry Browne was the Libertarian Party nominee for President in 1996 and 2000. He was a tall glass of freedom-loving ice water in the hot and dry politics-as-usual desert. He quenched my libertarian soul.

While everyone else is celebrating the “4th of July” I’m celebrating Independence Day. On this Independence Day I’m celebrating by remembering the man that spoke with my voice before I knew what my voice was. Browne wrote an article on July 4th, 2003 (3 years before he died) called, “Uncelebrating the 4th of July“.

The article sums up perfectly how I feel about Independence Day right now. As was so often the case, Harry Browne was years ahead of his time.

I remember around that same year (2003) I was one of those libertarians that supported the Iraq war. I was a libertarian-in-progress or maybe some today would have called me a “Wayne Allyn Root” libertarian. I wrote an email to Harry Browne giving him my opinion about the war and asking him what he thought of my reasoning. He didn’t think much of it.

Read More »

It’s Friday and that means it’s time for another installment of  “Quick Hits”.

Helen Thomas and Chip Reid berated White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs the other day for pre-selecting questions for Obama’s “town hall” and “controlling” the press. It appears that the honeymoon (I call it the “Obamagasm”) is coming to an end. Gibbs seems to be out of his league as Obama’s Press Secretary. I’ll be surprised if he makes it through Obama’s first and hopefully only term.

There is one particular forbidden health care question for Obama. I would love to hear his answer to the following question:

“Mr. President, you are considered a Constitutional scholar. Could you educate the American people a bit and tell them what section, article, or amendment permits the federal government to provide health care?”

Sure, he would dodge the question, but it is one dodge that I long to hear.

On Monday, Ron Paul’s son Rand Paul held another money bomb campaign fund raiser. The goal was to break $100k. The goal was met. This is huge news and a great sign that the Ron Paul wing of the Republican Party is not going anywhere. Rand Paul raised over $100,000 in about a month without an official fund raiser. Senator Rand Paul has a nice ring to it.

There was high drama last Friday afternoon on the House floor during the debate on the narrowly passed Cap and Trade bill. The Republicans kept pointing out that the legislation will lose more jobs and put a higher tax burden on the American people.

Read More »

In 1776, the Declaration of Independence was read in three spots in Pennsylvania following the Fourth of July. One spot was Easton’s historic Center Square. 233 years later, a small band of patriots show up once more.

by Jake Towne, the Champion of the Constitution
Originally published July 2, 2009 at http://www.nolanchart.com/article6584.html

On Friday, July 3rd at 7 PM, the Lehigh Valley Tea Party organization is holding a rally in Easton’s historic Center Square.  See this LINK for details.  The Declaration of Indepedence will be read followed by a series of speeches by invited speakers.  I am delighted to be speaking at such an historic event, and I urge you to stop by if you are in the area.

Read More »

D o w n s i z e r – D i s p a t c h

Quote of the Day: “It is my living sentiment, and by the blessing of God, it shall be my dying sentiment. Independence now, and independence forever.” – Daniel Webster, in an August 2, 1826 eulogy to Thomas Jefferson and John Adams; both had died on July 4th.

* voted for the lesser evil or
* voted for candidates that lost or
* would have voted for “none of the above” if the option had been available or
* didn’t vote at all because they didn’t want to endorse or encourage any of the candidates?

Do elections really confer consent? We don’t think so.

What does confer consent? Silence.

If we don’t inform our elected representatives that we object to their policies, then we shouldn’t be surprised if they assume their election to high office implies consent to their actions.

Those who mostly favor what our government is doing can celebrate July 4th content in the knowledge that they’re getting what they want. But what about the rest of us?

A case can be made that the transgressions of our government today are vastly greater than those against which the Founders rebelled on July 4, 1776. If we applaud what they did then, we should be willing to emulate at least to a certain, peaceful extent.

Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence…

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

Jefferson and the other Founders withdrew their consent and listed their reasons for doing so. Shouldn’t we do the same on this July 4th, and on every July 4th for as long as our government violates our inalienable rights?

You can peacefully state your discontent using a special, temporary campaign on DownsizeDC.org’s Educate the Powerful System. That campaign is titled, “Does the government have your consent on this July 4th?”

Please use your personal comments to tell your Representatives in Congress that you don’t approve of the job they’re doing. Let them know that you’re tired of them expanding the government’s size, power, and expense far, far beyond what the Constitution provides.     Read More »

Yesterday Ron Paul appeared again on “Freedom Watch” with Judge Andrew Napolitano. The Judge delivered another stellar opening monologue that was extremely critical of the hate crime legislation making its way through Congress.

Following the monologue Ron Paul was brought in to discuss the topic further. I enjoy these types of discussions because they steadfastly refute all of the completely inane and idiotic charges that Ron Paul is a “racist”. Anyone who refuses to allow emotional “arguments” cloud their reasoned judgment should understand that Ron Paul is completely opposed to any kind of racism or collectivism.

Unfortunately, most people don’t do their homework. They drool through life digesting all the news they can about the latest Michael Jackson-type death of the day. Ignorance is not bliss, ignorance is willful neglect. It should be our responsibility to know that our country of birth is fundamentally moving away from the principles of its founding. With that responsibility should come individual action.

I find it humorous that they call themselves “progressives”, as if advocating a return to the principles found in the Constitution makes one a “regressive”. No, it appears to me that so called “progressives” want to return to a time before the American Revolution, a time of empire and tyranny. If we want to have “progress” in this country it should mean restoring the rule of law found in our Constitution not continuing the practice of ignoring it.

Check out the latest episode of Freedom Watch below. Other than Ron Paul, the Judge welcomed Mary Ruwart, John McManus, David Bruckner, and Jim Babka to the show.

Can you answer the following questions?

1. What is the supreme law of the land?
2. What do we call the first ten amendments to the Constitution?
3. What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress?
4. How many Justices are on the Supreme Court?
5. Who wrote the Declaration of Independence?
6. What ocean is on the East Coast of the United States?
7. What are the two major political parties in the United States?
8. We elect a U.S. Senator for how many years?
9. Who was the first President of the United States?
10. Who is in charge of the executive branch?

Hopefully you can answer most (if not all) of these basic questions correctly. But these questions were presented to 1,134 [public] high school students in Arizona, and not a single one could answer more than seven out of ten correctly.

The biggest shocker (for me) is that more than 73% couldn’t name George Washington as our first president.

Wow. What more proof do we need that public schools have failed?

Sometimes, out of curiosity (or perhaps some masochistic tendency), I’ll listen to neoconservative talk radio (Limbaugh, Hannity, or a local personality) to see what they have to say about the day’s events.  Usually I am quickly sickened with complaints about how suddenly everything is going to hell in a handbasket now that Obama is president.  They conveniently ignore the fact that President Bush was much like Herbert Hoover (only worse).  He increased the federal budget enormously (much of it on domestic spending) and worked to give unprecedented (and unconstitutional) powers to the executive branch, among other things.

Yes, Bush was a terrible president.  Some argue that his abuses should be considered traitorous and he should be convicted for treason.  Then today I ran across an interesting article by Bush-hater Ted Rall in which he pines for the “good old days” of George Bush:

I haven’t forgiven George W. Bush for stealing two elections, starting two wars, bankrupting the treasury and doing his damnedest to turn the U.S. into a fascist state. He deserves one of hell’s hottest picnic spots for refusing to lift a finger to bring the 9/11 murderers to justice. Bush was stupid. He was vicious. He should be in prison.

He was the worst president the U.S. had ever had. Until this one.

On major issues and a lot of minor ones, Obama is the same as or worse than Bush. But Bush had an opposition to contend with. Obama has a compliant Democratic Congress. Lulled to somnolent apathy by Obama’s charming manners, mastery of English (and yes, the color of his skin), leftist activists and journalists have been reduced to quiet disappointment, mild grumbling and unaccountable patience.

I don’t care about window dressing. Sure, it’s nice that Obama is intelligent. But policies matter–not charm. And Obama’s policies are at least as bad as Bush’s. [Continue Article]

By John Browne – Senior Market Strategist, Euro Pacific Capital.

Through its rhetoric and actions, the Obama Administration has made it clear that no matter the current or future costs, the federal government will not allow a collapse of the banking system. The resulting aura of certitude has, in turn, encouraged investors to roll the dice one more time. Some of these investors are likely trying to make good prior investment losses through speculative trading in U.S. equities. The surety of the government guarantee has sadly allowed them to overlook the fact that U.S. corporate earnings continue to fall.

So, as is the case with all government guarantees, the risks our economy faces are now disproportionate to the opportunities. Haven’t we been down this road before?

The operative question remains whether the government can reward the current round of investment by averting an economic depression. If not, what is the justification for investing in U.S. equities or high-yielding corporate bonds?

Given that the majority of government spending is on corporate bailouts and social programs, rather than infrastructure improvement, I would argue that the odds of recovery are long.

Economists broadly agree that greater economic bang for the buck is achieved through infrastructure spending. It is surmised that for every $10 billion spent on infrastructure, some 35,000 real, wealth-creating jobs are created. Therefore, a government spending $1 trillion should create some 3.5 million new jobs.

When President Eisenhower, the last big spender on infrastructure, left office in 1961, infrastructure amounted to some 12 percent of federal spending. The ensuing generations have neglected such spending in favor of wealth transfers and efforts to control social development. Today, only some 2.5 percent of the federal budget goes towards infrastructure.

Read More »

An excellent op-ed in the Washington Times today authored by Congressman Ron Paul hammers home the Old Right ideas of non-interventionism in foreign policy arguably better than he ever did during his Presidential campaign.

Paul writes:

Neoconservatives who have come to power in both the Democratic and Republican parties argue that the U.S. must ether confront every evil in every corner of the globe or risk danger at home. We need to “fight them over there” they say, so we don’t have to “fight them over here.” This argument presents a false choice. We do not have to pick between interventionism and vulnerability. The complexity of our world is exactly why the lessons of our past should ring true and demand a return to a traditional, pro-American foreign policy: one of nonintervention.

In this piece Ron Paul seems to be taking some lessons from his son Rand. Paul the elder is framing his non-interventionist foreign policy beliefs in a way that should be less off-putting to die hard neo-conservatives.

This is truly Ron Paul at his best. Read the entire article here.

I was perusing the Federal Budget recently, and I had sort of a knee jerk reaction to most of the items I saw.  Keep in mind, what I propose below is only a starting point, and it is in no way meant to be a “final draft”.  I’m extremely interested in your input!

1st draft tax plan:

1. GIVE AWAY AMTRAK.  Privatizing CONRAIL worked, this will too. Savings: $1.4 Billion annually. Privatizing it also has the effect of generating tax revenues, as private ownership will make it profitable.
2. Sell (at a minimum) 1/2 of all land owned by the Federal Gvt.  “We the people” currently own an estimated 999,390,920 acres, about 44% of ALL US landmass.  By the way, the Bureau of Land Management has no idea how much land it (we) own(s) anymore. Sell for $500/acre, generating $499,695,460,000, yep, that’s almost $500Billion.  Besides, why does the Federal Gvt need all that land?  Why are they aquiring more every day?
3. Eliminate the Department of Education.  Savings: $178 Billion annually.
4. Eliminate the Department of Agriculture. Savings: $124 Billion annually.
5. Bring ALL troops home, including closure of all foreign military bases (we don’t need troops in Europe and Japan. . .), estimated annual savings: $325 Billion (half the annual budget).
6. Cut the Deparment of Health and Human Services.  Thanks so much for telling us to wash our hands to avoid the pig flu!  Common sense costs us: $71 Billion annually.  They administer Medicare and Medicaid also, both complete failures that are underfunded (and we want to Nationalize healthcare? – we’ve already proven we can’t manage it!), which constitutes $666 Billion annually.  It, as should social security, be a voluntary, not mandatory, system.
7. Eliminate the Department of Homeland Security (this can be taken care of in our normal military budget).  Savings: $44 BN
8. Cut Department of Housing and Urban Development in half at a minimum.  There’s $300 MN in there for housing for persons with AIDS, enough to buy 1,500 homes for $200,000 each.  Savings $105 BN
9. Cut Department of Labor in half at a minimum, savings: $27 BN
10. Cut Department of State in half at a minimum (we fund foreign military to the tune of $5 BN a year, and disburse loans to foreign governments in the amount of $15 BN – which we’ll never get back).  Savings: $35 BN.
11. Eliminate, at a minimum, the entire IRS, as you’ll see reasoning for below, from the Treasury Dept, saving $11 BN

Total Savings / Earnings: $1.422 Trillion

12.  Eliminate graduated scale federal income tax and replace with fair tax based on purchases – no tax on food, at all!!  Set Federal fair tax rate @ 10% max (we could delve into this more and probably wriggle it to 8% or less).  Total sales taxes (when including local) capped @ 20% (I don’t think any local ST is over 10%, is there?).  Furthermore, you don’t need a complicated system to file returns, etc.  You make your purchase, you’re done.  Businesses file sales tax returns, this would just be one more line.

Read More »